[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_vrr: Update condition checks for flipline test
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Jan 20 10:53:53 UTC 2021
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:36:59AM +0000, Modem, Bhanuprakash wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 12:46 AM
> > To: Modem, Bhanuprakash <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
> > Cc: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_vrr: Update condition
> > checks for flipline test
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 07:47:12PM +0530, Bhanuprakash Modem wrote:
> > > This patch includes below updates
> > > * For Flipline test: if refresh_rate <= Vrr_min then
> > > - Expected returned refresh rate would be vrr_max
> > > - At least 35% of the flips should be in threshold
> > > * Update "igt_display_commit_atomic" with "igt_display_commit2"
> > > * Add few debug prints
> >
> > Some ideas I had for a vrr test:
> > - test flipping at a few different rates
> > - make sure the interval between flip timestamps
> > matches the expected rate
> Actually, we are doing the same in our flipline[*] test.
>
> Example: if we have a monitor with vrr range of 40 - 60Hz
> We'll try to flip with 35, 50 and 65 Hz, and the difference between the
> two flip timestamps should be within the required threshold from the
> expected rate. A ~50us threshold is an arbitrary.
>
> [*] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/392037
>
> > - otherwise confirm the timestamps are sensible. Not quite sure what the
> > best way would be. One idea was to just make sure the timestamp points
> > to more or less the correct point in time. Another idea was to drive
> > the whole loop baed on the timestamps + target refresh rate (ie. wait
> > for event, schedule next flip for event timestamps + whatever time we
> > have left to reach the exected refresh rate). This latter idea I think
> > would catch bugs where the interval between timestamps is correct but
> > the absolute times are not correct (eg. if the timestamps are
> > miscorrected to point fr into the future based on the max vblank
> > length, or too close into the future based on min vblank length).
> > - the busy loop thing I don't think should be needed. Sure, there is
> > some wakeup latency due to C-states and whatnot, but it should be
> > possible to compensate to make sure we reach the target refresh rate
> > w/o spinning.
> This part is not clear to me.
>
> Ex. To generate the flips with refresh rate 50Hz (ie. 20000000ns), below
> is the expected sequence:
>
> * Request a flip & wait for flip completion event
> * Capture the event timestamp to compare
> * Wait 20000000ns for next flip
That would anyway need a bit of correction to account for event
delivery latency + whatever overhead we have in submitting the
flip.
But in addition I was suggesting that we calculate how long to
wait based on the flip event timestamp + whatever extra is needed
on top to reach the target frame rate. Thus if the timestamp is
garbage the test should fail since we'll end up flipping at the
wrong rate.
> * Repeat
>
> Am I missing something here?
>
> >
> > >
> > > V2:
> > > * Rebase
> > >
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas at amd.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/kms_vrr.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/kms_vrr.c b/tests/kms_vrr.c
> > > index beb06854f..e6edd131f 100644
> > > --- a/tests/kms_vrr.c
> > > +++ b/tests/kms_vrr.c
> > > @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void set_vrr_on_pipe(data_t *data, enum pipe
> > pipe, bool enabled)
> > > {
> > > igt_pipe_set_prop_value(&data->display, pipe, IGT_CRTC_VRR_ENABLED,
> > > enabled);
> > > - igt_display_commit_atomic(&data->display, 0, NULL);
> > > + igt_display_commit2(&data->display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Prepare the display for testing on the given pipe. */
> > > @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ static void prepare_test(data_t *data, igt_output_t
> > *output, enum pipe pipe)
> > > */
> > > igt_pipe_set_prop_value(&data->display, pipe, IGT_CRTC_VRR_ENABLED,
> > 0);
> > >
> > > - igt_display_commit_atomic(&data->display,
> > > - DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET, NULL);
> > > + igt_display_commit2(&data->display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Waits for the vblank interval. Returns the vblank timestamp in ns.
> > */
> > > @@ -291,14 +290,10 @@ flip_and_measure(data_t *data, igt_output_t
> > *output, enum pipe pipe,
> > > * difference between 144Hz and 143Hz which should give this
> > > * enough accuracy for most use cases.
> > > */
> > > - if (rate_ns <= vtest_ns.min && rate_ns >= vtest_ns.max)
> > > + if ((rate_ns < vtest_ns.min) && (rate_ns >= vtest_ns.max))
> > > diff_ns = rate_ns;
> > > - else if (rate_ns > vtest_ns.min)
> > > - diff_ns = vtest_ns.min;
> > > - else if (rate_ns < vtest_ns.max)
> > > - diff_ns = vtest_ns.max;
> > > else
> > > - diff_ns = rate_ns;
> > > + diff_ns = vtest_ns.max;
> > > diff_ns -= event_ns - last_event_ns;
> > >
> > > if (llabs(diff_ns) < 50000ll)
> > > @@ -323,8 +318,8 @@ flip_and_measure(data_t *data, igt_output_t *output,
> > enum pipe pipe,
> > > while (get_time_ns() < target_ns);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - igt_info("Completed %u flips, %u were in threshold for
> > %"PRIu64"ns.\n",
> > > - total_flip, total_pass, rate_ns);
> > > + igt_info("Completed %u flips, %u were in threshold for (%llu Hz)
> > %"PRIu64"ns.\n",
> > > + total_flip, total_pass, (NSECS_PER_SEC/rate_ns), rate_ns);
> > >
> > > return total_flip ? ((total_pass * 100) / total_flip) : 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -338,8 +333,8 @@ test_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
> > igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
> > > range_t range = get_vrr_range(data, output);
> > > uint64_t rate = vtest_ns.mid;
> > >
> > > - igt_info("VRR Test execution on %s, PIPE_%s\n",
> > > - output->name, kmstest_pipe_name(pipe));
> > > + igt_info("VRR Test execution on %s, PIPE_%s with VRR range: (%u-%u)
> > Hz\n",
> > > + output->name, kmstest_pipe_name(pipe), range.min, range.max);
> > >
> > > prepare_test(data, output, pipe);
> > >
> > > @@ -370,46 +365,42 @@ test_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
> > igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
> > > * decision boundary.
> > > *
> > > * Example: if range is 40 - 60Hz and
> > > - * if refresh_rate > 60Hz:
> > > + * if refresh_rate > 60Hz or <= 40Hz:
> > > * Flip should happen at the flipline boundary & returned
> > refresh rate
> > > * would be 60Hz.
> > > * if refresh_rate is 50Hz:
> > > * Flip will happen right away so returned refresh rate is
> > 50Hz.
> > > - * if refresh_rate < 40Hz:
> > > - * Flip should happen at the vmax so the returned refresh rate
> > > - * would be 40Hz.
> > > */
> > > if (flags & TEST_FLIPLINE) {
> > > - rate = rate_from_refresh(range.min - 5);
> > > + rate = rate_from_refresh(range.max + 5);
> > > result = flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate,
> > TEST_DURATION_NS);
> > > igt_assert_f(result > 75,
> > > - "Refresh rate %"PRIu64"ns: Target VRR on threshold
> > not reached, result was %u%%\n",
> > > - rate, result);
> > > + "Refresh rate (%u Hz) %"PRIu64"ns: Target VRR on
> > threshold not reached, result was %u%%\n",
> > > + (range.max + 5), rate, result);
> > >
> > > - rate = rate_from_refresh(range.max + 5);
> > > + rate = rate_from_refresh(range.min - 5);
> > > result = flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate,
> > TEST_DURATION_NS);
> > > - igt_assert_f(result > 75,
> > > - "Refresh rate %"PRIu64"ns: Target VRR on threshold
> > not reached, result was %u%%\n",
> > > - rate, result);
> > > + igt_assert_f(result > 35,
> > > + "Refresh rate (%u Hz) %"PRIu64"ns: Target VRR on
> > threshold not reached, result was %u%%\n",
> > > + (range.min - 5), rate, result);
> > > }
> > >
> > > rate = vtest_ns.mid;
> > > result = flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate,
> > TEST_DURATION_NS);
> > > igt_assert_f(result > 75,
> > > - "Refresh rate %"PRIu64"ns: Target VRR on threshold not
> > reached, result was %u%%\n",
> > > - rate, result);
> > > + "Refresh rate (%u Hz) %"PRIu64"ns: Target VRR on threshold
> > not reached, result was %u%%\n",
> > > + ((range.max + range.min) / 2), rate, result);
> > >
> > > set_vrr_on_pipe(data, pipe, 0);
> > > result = flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate,
> > TEST_DURATION_NS);
> > > igt_assert_f(result < 10,
> > > - "Refresh rate %"PRIu64"ns: Target VRR off threshold
> > exceeded, result was %u%%\n",
> > > - rate, result);
> > > + "Refresh rate (%u Hz) %"PRIu64"ns: Target VRR off
> > threshold exceeded, result was %u%%\n",
> > > + ((range.max + range.min) / 2), rate, result);
> > >
> > > /* Clean-up */
> > > igt_plane_set_fb(data->primary, NULL);
> > > igt_output_set_pipe(output, PIPE_NONE);
> > > - igt_display_commit_atomic(&data->display,
> > > - DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET, NULL);
> > > + igt_display_commit2(&data->display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> > >
> > > igt_remove_fb(data->drm_fd, &data->fb1);
> > > igt_remove_fb(data->drm_fd, &data->fb0);
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > igt-dev mailing list
> > > igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list