[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 13/17] Verify execbuf fails with stale PXP buffer after teardown
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Jun 3 21:41:32 UTC 2021
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:33:40AM -0700, Alan Previn wrote:
> Add a check to verify that reusing a stale protected buffer
> in a gem_execbuff (with a protected context) after a teardown
> (triggered by suspend-resume cycle) shall fail with -ENOEXEC error.
> Reuse the existing subtest function to with separate assets
> to minimize the number of suspend-resume cycles we take.
>
> NOTE: The end-to-end architecture requirement includes that
> any break in the links of the PXP sessions needs to trigger a
> full teardown and the application needs to be made aware of that
> allowing it to re-establish the end-to-end pipeline of buffers,
> contexts and renders again if it chooses to. This stricter
> behavior targets only contexts created with PXP enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_pxp.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c b/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c
> index f1ef0a24..b4f369ae 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c
> @@ -760,23 +760,45 @@ static void free_exec_assets(int i915, struct simple_exec_assets *data)
> static void test_pxp_pwrcycle_staleasset_execution(int i915, struct powermgt_data *pm)
> {
> int ret;
> - struct simple_exec_assets data = {0};
> + struct simple_exec_assets data[2] = {{0}, {0}};
> + uint32_t ctx2;
> + struct intel_bb *ibb2;
>
> /*
> - * Use normal buffers for testing for invalidation
> + * For data[0]: Use normal buffers for testing for invalidation
> * of protected contexts to ensure kernel is catching
> * the invalidated context (not buffer)
> */
> - prepare_exec_assets(i915, &data, true, false);
> - ret = gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, data.ibb, data.ctx, data.fencebuf);
> + prepare_exec_assets(i915, &data[0], true, false);
> + ret = gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, data[0].ibb, data[0].ctx, data[0].fencebuf);
> + igt_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + prepare_exec_assets(i915, &data[1], true, true);
> + ret = gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, data[1].ibb, data[1].ctx, data[1].fencebuf);
> igt_assert(ret == 0);
>
> trigger_powermgt_suspend_cycle(i915, pm);
>
> - ret = gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, data.ibb, data.ctx, data.fencebuf);
> + ret = gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, data[0].ibb, data[0].ctx, data[0].fencebuf);
> igt_assert_f((ret == -EACCES), "Executing stale pxp context didn't fail with -EACCES\n");
>
> - free_exec_assets(i915, &data);
> + /*
> + * For data[1]: after teardown, alloc new assets for context but
> + * reuse the bo to ensure the kernel is catching the
> + * invalidated bo (not context)
> + */
> + ret = create_ctx_with_params(i915, true, true, true, false, &ctx2);
> + igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> + igt_assert_eq(get_ctx_protected_param(i915, ctx2), 1);
> + ibb2 = intel_bb_create_with_context(i915, ctx2, 4096);
> + igt_assert(ibb2);
> + intel_bb_detach_intel_buf(data[1].ibb, data[1].fencebuf);
> + intel_bb_add_intel_buf(ibb2, data[1].fencebuf, true);
> + ret = gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, ibb2, ctx2, data[1].fencebuf);
> + igt_assert_f((ret == -ENOEXEC), "Executing stale pxp buffer didn't fail with -ENOEXEC\n");
> +
> + free_exec_assets(i915, &data[0]);
> + free_exec_assets(i915, &data[1]);
> }
>
> igt_main
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list