[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 08/11] tests/kms_addfb_basic: Add invalid buffer object test for discrete

[Ruhl, Michael J]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Latvala, Petri <petri.latvala at intel.com>
>Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 8:47 AM
>To: Ruhl, Michael J <michael.j.ruhl at intel.com>
>Cc: Patnana, Venkata Sai <venkata.sai.patnana at intel.com>; igt-
>dev at lists.freedesktop.org; Mohammed Khajapasha
><mohammed.khajapasha at intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 08/11] tests/kms_addfb_basic: Add invalid buffer
>object test for discrete
>
>On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:30:46PM +0300, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Patnana, Venkata Sai <venkata.sai.patnana at intel.com>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 8:18 AM
>> >To: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>> >Cc: Patnana, Venkata Sai <venkata.sai.patnana at intel.com>; Mohammed
>> >Khajapasha <mohammed.khajapasha at intel.com>; Latvala; Latvala, Petri
>> ><petri.latvala at intel.com>; Ruhl, Michael J <michael.j.ruhl at intel.com>
>> >Subject: [PATCH i-g-t 08/11] tests/kms_addfb_basic: Add invalid buffer
>object
>> >test for discrete
>> >
>> >From: Mohammed Khajapasha <mohammed.khajapasha at intel.com>
>> >
>> >Add invalid buffer object test case for discrete, to validate
>> >IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2 ioctl for LMEM, the framebuffer backing
>> >gem objects should be from local memory for discrete.
>> >
>> >Cc: Latvala, Petri <petri.latvala at intel.com>
>> >Cc: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl at intel.com>
>> >Signed-off-by: Mohammed Khajapasha
>> ><mohammed.khajapasha at intel.com>
>> >---
>> > tests/kms_addfb_basic.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c b/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c
>> >index 1fb18d668f..aac74a7568 100644
>> >--- a/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c
>> >+++ b/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c
>> >@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>> >
>> > #include "igt_rand.h"
>> > #include "igt_device.h"
>> >+#include "i915/intel_memory_region.h"
>> >
>> > uint32_t gem_bo;
>> > uint32_t gem_bo_small;
>> >@@ -146,6 +147,21 @@ static void invalid_tests(int fd)
>> > 		igt_assert(f.modifier[0] == 0);
>> > 	}
>> >
>> >+	igt_subtest("invalid-smem-bo-on-discrete") {
>> >+		int devid;
>> >+		uint32_t handle, stride;
>> >+		uint64_t size;
>> >+
>> >+		igt_require_intel(fd);
>> >+		devid = intel_get_drm_devid(fd);
>>
>> This will only work on if the discrete card is the only card on the system.
>>
>> Is there a better way to:
>>
>> 1) identify discrete cards and/or
>> 2) specifically select a discrete card for testing?
>
>The test does not select the device to use. The admin _running_ the
>test does that, with IGT_DEVICE.

Ok, that makes sense.

I believe you (Petri) had a comment that should be addressed,
but from my perspective

Acked-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl at intel.com>

>With that done, mapping of results will be
>
>non-intel: skip
>intel integrated: skip
>intel discrete: actually tested
>
>which looks correct. We're trying to test what happens specifically
>if the used device is intel discrete, skip otherwise.

>
>--
>Petri Latvala