[igt-dev] [i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_fair: Extend icl ctx timestamp w/a to gen11

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 24/06/2021 13:22, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> 80ns timestamp interval identified for icl also applies to
> gen11 platforms. igt at gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline is
> passing with the change on ehl and jsl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay at intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c | 9 ++-------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> index 628f4df2..45237574 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> @@ -98,16 +98,11 @@ static uint64_t div64_u64_round_up(uint64_t x, uint64_t y)
>   	return (x + y - 1) / y;
>   }
>   
> -static bool is_icelake(int i915)
> -{
> -	return intel_get_device_info(intel_get_drm_devid(i915))->is_icelake;
> -}
> -
>   static uint64_t ns_to_ctx_ticks(int i915, uint64_t ns)
>   {
>   	int f = read_timestamp_frequency(i915);
> -	if (is_icelake(i915))
> -		f = 12500000; /* icl!!! are you feeling alright? CTX vs CS */
> +	if (intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(i915)) == 11)
> +		f = 12500000; /* gen11!!! are you feeling alright? CTX vs CS */
>   	return div64_u64_round_up(ns * f, NSEC64);
>   }
>   
> 

Same as the kernel patch, okay, I can push this one as well.

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko