[igt-dev] [RFC i-g-t 11/11] Verify gem_execbuf fails with stale PXP buffer after teardown
Alan Previn
alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com
Tue Mar 2 22:53:34 UTC 2021
Add a subtest to verify that reusing a stale protected buffer
with a fresh protected context, in a gem_execbuff after a
teardown (triggered by suspend-resume cycle) shall fail
with -EIO error.
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>
---
tests/i915/i915_pxp.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pxp.c b/tests/i915/i915_pxp.c
index b8c82ea9..4d639c0f 100644
--- a/tests/i915/i915_pxp.c
+++ b/tests/i915/i915_pxp.c
@@ -776,10 +776,10 @@ static void test_protected_session_teardown(int i915, uint32_t test_cfg,
uint32_t encrypted_pixels_b4[TSTSURF_SIZE/TSTSURF_BYTESPP];
uint32_t encrypted_pixels_aft[TSTSURF_SIZE/TSTSURF_BYTESPP];
int matched_after_keychange = 0, loop = 0;
- uint32_t ctx, fencebo;
+ uint32_t ctx, ctx2, fencebo;
struct intel_buf *fencebuf;
struct buf_ops *bops;
- struct intel_bb *ibb;
+ struct intel_bb *ibb, *ibb2;
switch (test_cfg) {
case SESSION_PMSUSPEND_TEARDOWN_KEY_CHANGE:
@@ -803,6 +803,7 @@ static void test_protected_session_teardown(int i915, uint32_t test_cfg,
break;
case SESSION_PMSUSPEND_TEARDOWN_PROTCTX_BAN_EXEC:
+ case SESSION_PMSUSPEND_TEARDOWN_PROTBO_BAN_EXEC:
ctx = create_protected_ctx(i915, true, true,
true, false, 0);
assert_ctx_protected_param(i915, ctx, true);
@@ -813,10 +814,16 @@ static void test_protected_session_teardown(int i915, uint32_t test_cfg,
bops = buf_ops_create(i915);
igt_assert(bops);
- fencebo = create_protected_bo(i915, 4096,
- false, false, 0);
- igt_assert(fencebo);
- fill_bo_content(i915, fencebo, 1024, 0x0);
+ if (test_cfg == SESSION_PMSUSPEND_TEARDOWN_PROTCTX_BAN_EXEC) {
+ /* use normal buffers for testing for invalidation
+ * of protected contexts to ensure kernel is catching
+ * the invalidated context*/
+ fencebo = alloc_and_fill_dest_buff(i915, false,
+ 4096, 0);
+ } else {
+ fencebo = alloc_and_fill_dest_buff(i915, true,
+ 4096, 0);
+ }
fencebuf = intel_buf_create_using_handle(bops, fencebo,
256, 4, 32, 0, I915_TILING_NONE, 0);
@@ -824,12 +831,30 @@ static void test_protected_session_teardown(int i915, uint32_t test_cfg,
gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, ibb, ctx, fencebuf, 0);
trigger_powermgt_suspend_cycle(i915, pm);
- gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, ibb, ctx, fencebuf, -EIO);
+
+ if (test_cfg == SESSION_PMSUSPEND_TEARDOWN_PROTBO_BAN_EXEC) {
+ /* after teardown, alloc new assets for everything
+ * except the bo to ensure the kernel is catching
+ * the invalidated bo
+ */
+ ctx2 = create_protected_ctx(i915, true, true,
+ true, false, 0);
+ assert_ctx_protected_param(i915, ctx2, true);
+ ibb2 = intel_bb_create_with_context(i915, ctx2, 4096);
+ igt_assert(ibb2);
+ gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, ibb2, ctx2, fencebuf, -EIO);
+ } else {
+ gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, ibb, ctx, fencebuf, -EIO);
+ }
intel_bb_destroy(ibb);
intel_buf_destroy(fencebuf);
gem_close(i915, fencebo);
gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx);
+ if (test_cfg == SESSION_PMSUSPEND_TEARDOWN_PROTBO_BAN_EXEC) {
+ intel_bb_destroy(ibb2);
+ gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx2);
+ }
buf_ops_destroy(bops);
break;
@@ -953,6 +978,11 @@ igt_main
SESSION_PMSUSPEND_TEARDOWN_PROTCTX_BAN_EXEC,
&pm);
}
+ igt_subtest("reject-old-buffer-execution-after-suspend-resume") {
+ test_protected_session_teardown(i915,
+ SESSION_PMSUSPEND_TEARDOWN_PROTBO_BAN_EXEC,
+ &pm);
+ }
}
igt_fixture {
--
2.25.1
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list