[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v25 31/35] tests/gem_mmap_offset: Use intel_buf wrapper code instead direct

Zbigniew Kempczyński zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com
Tue Mar 16 18:00:47 UTC 2021


Generally when playing with intel_buf we should use wrapper code
instead of adding it to intel_bb directly. Code checks required
alignment on specific gens so protects us from passing unaligned
properly addresses.

Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
Cc: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek at intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 tests/i915/gem_mmap_offset.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_mmap_offset.c b/tests/i915/gem_mmap_offset.c
index 5e48cd697..8f2006274 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_mmap_offset.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_mmap_offset.c
@@ -614,8 +614,8 @@ static void blt_coherency(int i915)
 	dst = create_bo(bops, 1, width, height);
 	size = src->surface[0].size;
 
-	intel_bb_add_object(ibb, src->handle, size, src->addr.offset, 0, false);
-	intel_bb_add_object(ibb, dst->handle, size, dst->addr.offset, 0, true);
+	intel_bb_add_intel_buf(ibb, src, false);
+	intel_bb_add_intel_buf(ibb, dst, true);
 
 	intel_bb_blt_copy(ibb,
 			  src, 0, 0, src->surface[0].stride,
-- 
2.26.0



More information about the igt-dev mailing list