[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for intel-ci: Unblock core_hotunplug at hot*bind* subtests (rev3)
Petri Latvala
petri.latvala at intel.com
Fri May 7 15:14:14 UTC 2021
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 04:58:10PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> On piątek, 7 maja 2021 16:39:37 CEST Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: intel-ci: Unblock core_hotunplug at hot*bind* subtests (rev3)
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89111/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_6081_full -> IGTPW_5791_full
> > ====================================================
> >
> > Summary
> > -------
> >
> > **FAILURE**
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_5791_full absolutely need to be
> > verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > introduced in IGTPW_5791_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
> > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> >
> > External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5791/index.html
> >
> > Possible new issues
> > -------------------
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_5791_full:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> >
> > * igt at kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-256x256-onscreen:
> > - shard-kbl: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
> > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6081/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-256x256-onscreen.html
> > [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5791/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-256x256-onscreen.html
> > - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][3]
> > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5791/shard-apl8/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-256x256-onscreen.html
> > - shard-glk: [PASS][4] -> [FAIL][5]
> > [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6081/shard-glk1/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-256x256-onscreen.html
> > [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5791/shard-glk6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-256x256-onscreen.html
>
> Even though core_hotunplug at hotrebind-lateclose test was executed
> (successfully) in the same run before the above failures occurred, plenty of
> other tests, including a few kms_cursor_crc subtests, completed without any
> regressions in between. Then, it seems hardly possible to me core_hotunplug
> is responsible for those failures.
That looks about right.
Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list