[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 12/16] Verify execbuf fails with stale PXP buffer after teardown
Alan Previn
alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com
Fri May 14 06:49:49 UTC 2021
Add a subtest to verify that reusing a stale protected buffer
in a gem_execbuff (with a protected context) after a teardown
(triggered by suspend-resume cycle) shall fail with -EIO error.
NOTE: The end-to-end architecture requirement includes that
any break in the links of the PXP sessions needs to trigger a
full teardown and the application needs to be made aware of that
allowing it to re-establish the end-to-end pipeline of buffers,
contexts and renders again if it chooses to. This stricter
behavior targets only contexts created with PXP enabled.
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>
---
tests/i915/gem_pxp.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c b/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c
index 1952e230..605b6524 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test PXP that manages protected content through arbitrated
/* test-configs for power-management triggered protected session teardown */
#define SESSION_PMSUSPEND_TEARDOWN_KEY_CHANGE 1
#define SESSION_PMSUSPEND_STALEPROTCTX_BAN_EXEC 2
+#define SESSION_PMSUSPEND_STALEPROTBO_BAN_EXEC 3
/* Struct and defintions for power management. */
struct powermgt_data {
@@ -688,10 +689,10 @@ static void test_protected_session_teardown(int i915, uint32_t test_cfg,
uint32_t encrypted_pixels_b4[TSTSURF_SIZE/TSTSURF_BYTESPP];
uint32_t encrypted_pixels_aft[TSTSURF_SIZE/TSTSURF_BYTESPP];
int matched_after_keychange = 0, loop = 0;
- uint32_t ctx, fencebo;
+ uint32_t ctx, ctx2, fencebo;
struct intel_buf *fencebuf;
struct buf_ops *bops;
- struct intel_bb *ibb;
+ struct intel_bb *ibb, *ibb2;
switch (test_cfg) {
case SESSION_PMSUSPEND_TEARDOWN_KEY_CHANGE:
@@ -712,14 +713,19 @@ static void test_protected_session_teardown(int i915, uint32_t test_cfg,
break;
case SESSION_PMSUSPEND_STALEPROTCTX_BAN_EXEC:
+ case SESSION_PMSUSPEND_STALEPROTBO_BAN_EXEC:
ctx = create_protected_ctx(i915, true, true, true, false, 0);
assert_ctx_protected_param(i915, ctx, true);
- /* use normal buffers for testing for invalidation
- * of protected contexts to ensure kernel is catching
- * the invalidated context (not buffer)
- */
- fencebo = alloc_and_fill_dest_buff(i915, false, 4096, 0);
+ if (test_cfg == SESSION_PMSUSPEND_STALEPROTCTX_BAN_EXEC) {
+ /* use normal buffers for testing for invalidation
+ * of protected contexts to ensure kernel is catching
+ * the invalidated context
+ */
+ fencebo = alloc_and_fill_dest_buff(i915, false, 4096, 0);
+ } else {
+ fencebo = alloc_and_fill_dest_buff(i915, true, 4096, 0);
+ }
ibb = intel_bb_create_with_context(i915, ctx, 4096);
igt_assert(ibb);
@@ -734,12 +740,31 @@ static void test_protected_session_teardown(int i915, uint32_t test_cfg,
gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, ibb, ctx, fencebuf, 0);
trigger_powermgt_suspend_cycle(i915, pm);
- gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, ibb, ctx, fencebuf, -EACCES);
+ if (test_cfg == SESSION_PMSUSPEND_STALEPROTBO_BAN_EXEC) {
+ /* after teardown, alloc new assets for everything
+ * except the bo to ensure the kernel is catching
+ * the invalidated bo
+ */
+ ctx2 = create_protected_ctx(i915, true, true, true, false, 0);
+ assert_ctx_protected_param(i915, ctx2, true);
+ ibb2 = intel_bb_create_with_context(i915, ctx2, 4096);
+ igt_assert(ibb2);
+
+ intel_bb_detach_intel_buf(ibb, fencebuf);
+ intel_bb_add_intel_buf(ibb2, fencebuf, true);
+ gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, ibb2, ctx2, fencebuf, -ENOEXEC);
+ } else {
+ gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, ibb, ctx, fencebuf, -EACCES);
+ }
intel_bb_destroy(ibb);
intel_buf_destroy(fencebuf);
gem_close(i915, fencebo);
gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx);
+ if (test_cfg == SESSION_PMSUSPEND_STALEPROTBO_BAN_EXEC) {
+ intel_bb_destroy(ibb2);
+ gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx2);
+ }
buf_ops_destroy(bops);
break;
@@ -842,6 +867,9 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("reject-old-prot-context-execution-after-suspend-resume") {
test_protected_session_teardown(i915, SESSION_PMSUSPEND_STALEPROTCTX_BAN_EXEC, &pm);
}
+ igt_subtest("reject-old-prot-buffer-execution-after-suspend-resume") {
+ test_protected_session_teardown(i915, SESSION_PMSUSPEND_STALEPROTBO_BAN_EXEC, &pm);
+ }
}
igt_fixture {
--
2.25.1
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list