[igt-dev] [Patch V2] [i-g-t] tests/i915: test pass for no caching case
Dixit, Ashutosh
ashutosh.dixit at intel.com
Thu May 20 04:58:41 UTC 2021
On Wed, 19 May 2021 21:27:25 -0700, <viswax.krishna.raveendra.talabattula at intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Viswa Krishna Raveendra Talabattula <viswax.krishna.raveendra.talabattula at intel.com>
>
> The userptr memory does not support I915_CACHING_NONE(no caching) level
> as per the below commit related to i915 in the kernel
>
> drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2.
>
> So lets make test pass for both cases and return warning for 0 return
> code
>
> Signed-off-by: Viswa Krishna Raveendra Talabattula <viswax.krishna.raveendra.talabattula at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c b/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
> index aad5f141..2ac5713b 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
> @@ -2032,15 +2032,24 @@ static void test_set_caching(int i915)
>
> for (int idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(levels); idx++) {
> gem_userptr(i915, page, 4096, 0, 0, &handle);
> - igt_assert_eq(__gem_set_caching(i915, handle, levels[idx]), 0);
> + if (__gem_set_caching(i915, handle, levels[idx]) == 0)
> + igt_warn("Deprecated return code 0 from __gem_set_caching\n");
> + else
> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_set_caching(i915, handle, levels[idx]), -ENXIO);
This is not correct since -ENXIO is the expected return only for
I915_CACHING_NONE, not for I915_CACHING_CACHED. Same for below too.
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list