[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/1] tests/gem_sync: Use softpin path for no-reloc gens

[Dixit, Ashutosh]

On Tue, 02 Nov 2021 01:39:41 -0700, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
>
> Migrate to softpin with pre-warming batch or an allocator. Some tests
> which don't fork can use pre-warming batch which establishes offsets in
> the kernel before real work is performed. For such adding pinned flag
> + zeroing relocation is enough. For multiprocess scenarios we need to
> arbitrate and an allocator need to be used instead.
>
> v2: fix also tests which are not running on CI (Ashutosh)
>
> v3: use appropriate allocator handle (ahnd) within active_wakeup_ring
>     spinners (Ashutosh)

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>

One question below though.

> Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/i915/gem_sync.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_sync.c b/tests/i915/gem_sync.c
> index 0093ca25f..8c435845e 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_sync.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_sync.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ wakeup_ring(int fd, const intel_ctx_t *ctx, unsigned ring,
>	    int timeout, int wlen)
>  {
>	struct intel_engine_data ied;
> +	uint64_t ahnd = get_reloc_ahnd(fd, ctx->id);

Is this really needed in the parent even when they are only used in the
child processes? This pattern is used everywhere in this patch. Is this a
requirement of the allocator API? Thanks.