[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/8] i915_drm.h sync with drm-next
Petri Latvala
petri.latvala at intel.com
Thu Oct 7 12:34:57 UTC 2021
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 12:14:39PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Let's do a catch-up on i915_drm.h here.
> Only on i915_drm.h for now so we can have a clean
> view of the LOCAL_ ones that we need to remove.
>
> Taken from 25fed6b324ac ("Merge tag 'drm-intel-gt-next-2021-08-06-1' of ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/drm/drm-intel into drm-next")
>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> ---
> include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h b/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h
> index b9632bb2..c788a1ab 100644
> --- a/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h
> @@ -572,6 +572,15 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait {
> #define I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PREEMPTION (1ul << 2)
> #define I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_SEMAPHORES (1ul << 3)
> #define I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_ENGINE_BUSY_STATS (1ul << 4)
> +/*
> + * Indicates the 2k user priority levels are statically mapped into 3 buckets as
> + * follows:
> + *
> + * -1k to -1 Low priority
> + * 0 Normal priority
> + * 1 to 1k Highest priority
> + */
> +#define I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_STATIC_PRIORITY_MAP (1ul << 5)
>
> #define I915_PARAM_HUC_STATUS 42
>
> @@ -674,6 +683,9 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait {
> */
> #define I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_TIMELINE_FENCES 55
>
> +/* Query if the kernel supports the I915_USERPTR_PROBE flag. */
> +#define I915_PARAM_HAS_USERPTR_PROBE 56
> +
> /* Must be kept compact -- no holes and well documented */
>
> typedef struct drm_i915_getparam {
> @@ -923,6 +935,25 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_mmap_offset {
> * - I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT: Mappable aperture domain
> *
> * All other domains are rejected.
> + *
> + * Note that for discrete, starting from DG1, this is no longer supported, and
> + * is instead rejected. On such platforms the CPU domain is effectively static,
> + * where we also only support a single &drm_i915_gem_mmap_offset cache mode,
> + * which can't be set explicitly and instead depends on the object placements,
> + * as per the below.
> + *
> + * Implicit caching rules, starting from DG1:
> + *
> + * - If any of the object placements (see &drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions)
> + * contain I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE then the object will be allocated and
> + * mapped as write-combined only.
> + *
> + * - Everything else is always allocated and mapped as write-back, with the
> + * guarantee that everything is also coherent with the GPU.
> + *
> + * Note that this is likely to change in the future again, where we might need
> + * more flexibility on future devices, so making this all explicit as part of a
> + * new &drm_i915_gem_create_ext extension is probable.
> */
> struct drm_i915_gem_set_domain {
> /** @handle: Handle for the object. */
> @@ -2203,12 +2234,29 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_userptr {
> * through the GTT. If the HW can't support readonly access, an error is
> * returned.
> *
> + * I915_USERPTR_PROBE:
> + *
> + * Probe the provided @user_ptr range and validate that the @user_ptr is
> + * indeed pointing to normal memory and that the range is also valid.
> + * For example if some garbage address is given to the kernel, then this
> + * should complain.
> + *
> + * Returns -EFAULT if the probe failed.
> + *
> + * Note that this doesn't populate the backing pages, and also doesn't
> + * guarantee that the object will remain valid when the object is
> + * eventually used.
> + *
> + * The kernel supports this feature if I915_PARAM_HAS_USERPTR_PROBE
> + * returns a non-zero value.
> + *
> * I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED:
> *
> * NOT USED. Setting this flag will result in an error.
> */
> __u32 flags;
> #define I915_USERPTR_READ_ONLY 0x1
> +#define I915_USERPTR_PROBE 0x2
> #define I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED 0x80000000
> /**
> * @handle: Returned handle for the object.
> --
> 2.31.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list