[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_concurrent: Fix regression in test_resolution_with_output
Mark Yacoub
markyacoub at chromium.org
Mon Sep 20 15:27:17 UTC 2021
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 4:30 AM Srinivas, Vidya
<vidya.srinivas at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira at amd.com>
> > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 8:34 PM
> > To: Mark Yacoub <markyacoub at chromium.org>
> > Cc: Development mailing list for IGT GPU Tools <igt-
> > dev at lists.freedesktop.org>; Modem, Bhanuprakash
> > <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>; Mark Yacoub
> > <markyacoub at google.com>; Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas at intel.com>;
> > Nicholas Choi <nicholas.choi at amd.com>
> > Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_concurrent: Fix regression in
> > test_resolution_with_output
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Yes, this patch cause a regression in AMD.
> >
> > I applied the original patch after the CI reported a complete pass. I also
> > tested it in a VC4 and VKMS; just for curiosity, why did we not get this
> > regression in the CI?
>
> Hello Mark/Siqueira,
> I am not very sure. One possible reason could be the CI does not run all
> the subtests sequentially? With this line, it triggers the condition
> [ 7577.454215] [drm:drm_atomic_check_only] atomic driver check for 00000000bcb190f7 failed: -22
Do we know why is this the case? I'm curious to know which check is
failing and why it is failing. Is it failing at the following atomic
commit? Cause it could be a kernel bug maybe?
> I observed the same message even with upstream kernel.
>
> I have resubmitted the patch with is amd
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/454571/?series=94762&rev=2
> Kindly have a check. Thank you.
>
> Regards
> Vidya
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On 09/16, Mark Yacoub wrote:
> > > @Siquiera, I remember this also caused a regression on Qualcomm
> > > devices as well.
> > > Will removing this regress AMD? Any work around?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:30 AM Vidya Srinivas
> > > <vidya.srinivas at intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Staring commit fea0e38e690c30c6 "Making the test more generic"
> > > > test_resolution_with_output introduced setting igt_output_set_pipe
> > > > to PIPE_NONE. This is triggering atomic check failure resulting in
> > > > "enabled/connectors mismatch" under
> > drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset.
> > > > Patch fixes this issue.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > tests/kms_concurrent.c | 1 -
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_concurrent.c b/tests/kms_concurrent.c index
> > > > 25c67eb469d1..40096ea1c457 100644
> > > > --- a/tests/kms_concurrent.c
> > > > +++ b/tests/kms_concurrent.c
> > > > @@ -268,7 +268,6 @@ test_resolution_with_output(data_t *data, enum
> > > > pipe pipe, int max_planes, igt_ou
> > > >
> > > > /* switch to lower resolution */
> > > > igt_output_override_mode(output, mode_lo);
> > > > - igt_output_set_pipe(output, PIPE_NONE);
> > > > igt_display_commit2(&data->display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> > > >
> > > > /* switch back to higher resolution */
> > > > --
> > > > 2.33.0
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Rodrigo Siqueira
> > https://siqueira.tech
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list