[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/2] tests/i915/i915_pm_dc: Fix DC9 test
Bhatt, Jigar
jigar.bhatt at intel.com
Thu Sep 23 10:55:43 UTC 2021
-----Original Message-----
From: Latvala, Petri <petri.latvala at intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 4:14 PM
To: Bhatt, Jigar <jigar.bhatt at intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org; Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>; Varide, Nischal <nischal.varide at intel.com>; Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar at intel.com>; Sharma, Swati2 <swati2.sharma at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/2] tests/i915/i915_pm_dc: Fix DC9 test
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 03:48:57PM +0530, Jigar Bhatt wrote:
> Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/2] tests/i915/i915_pm_dc: Fix DC9
> test
Describe the code changes you're doing here, rather than the effect the changes will have. Helps reading the git history later.
> V1:
> Currently, check_dc9 is being called with reference
> (previous) counter being read after dpms_off call.
> At this time, already the counter is 0.
> We need to read the counter before dpms_off is called so that it holds
> the previous value which had incremented while testing shallow states
> (DC5 or DC6).
>
> V2:
> Bit cleaner code.[Imre]
> dump the i915_pm_runtime_status debugfs file in case of test
> failure.[Anshuman]
>
> V3:
> Disabling the polling during DC9 test “echo 0 >
> /sys/module/drm_kms_helper/parameters/poll”.[Anshuman]
>
> V4:
> passing right fd to igt_sysfs_get_boolean() function, moving save and
> get part of polling to setup_dc9_dpms().
>
> V5:
> Use macro for "/sys/module/drm_kms_helper/parameters/poll".
> Add igt_require when opening sysfs.
> Add igt_install_exit_handler(reset_kms_poll) so it will restore actual
> sysfs kms polling status.[Anshuman]
>
> Signed-off-by: Jigar Bhatt <jigar.bhatt at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c | 49
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c index
> 04acf839..f3c9f6ba 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@
> #define CHECK_DC3CO (1 << 2)
>
> #define PWR_DOMAIN_INFO "i915_power_domain_info"
> +#define RPM_STATUS "i915_runtime_pm_status"
> +#define KMS_POLL_PATH "/sys/module/drm_kms_helper/parameters/poll"
> +
> +bool kms_poll_saved_state;
>
> typedef struct {
> double r, g, b;
> @@ -393,23 +397,33 @@ static bool support_dc6(int debugfs_fd)
> return strstr(buf, "DC5 -> DC6 count"); }
>
> -static bool check_dc9(uint32_t debugfs_fd, int prev_dc, bool
> dc6_supported, int seconds)
> +static bool dc9_wait_entry(uint32_t debugfs_fd, int dc_target, int
> +prev_dc, int seconds)
> {
> /*
> * since we do not have DC9 counter,
> * so we rely on dc5/dc6 counter reset to check if display engine was in DC9.
> */
> - return igt_wait(dc6_supported ? read_dc_counter(debugfs_fd, CHECK_DC6) <
> - prev_dc : read_dc_counter(debugfs_fd, CHECK_DC5) <
> + return igt_wait(read_dc_counter(debugfs_fd, dc_target) >
> prev_dc, seconds, 100);
> }
>
> -static void setup_dc9_dpms(data_t *data, int prev_dc, bool
> dc6_supported)
> +static void check_dc9(data_t *data, int dc_target, int prev_dc)
> {
> + igt_assert_f(dc9_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_target, prev_dc, 3000),
> + "DC9 state is not achieved\n%s:\n%s\n", RPM_STATUS,
> + data->debugfs_dump = igt_sysfs_get(data->debugfs_fd, RPM_STATUS));
> +}
> +
> +static void setup_dc9_dpms(data_t *data, int dc_target, int sysfs_fd)
> +{
> + int prev_dc;
> +
> + kms_poll_saved_state = igt_sysfs_get_boolean(sysfs_fd, KMS_POLL_PATH);
> + igt_sysfs_set_boolean(sysfs_fd, KMS_POLL_PATH, 0);
> + prev_dc = read_dc_counter(data->debugfs_fd, dc_target);
> setup_dc_dpms(data);
> dpms_off(data);
> - igt_skip_on_f(!(igt_wait(dc6_supported ? read_dc_counter(data->debugfs_fd, CHECK_DC6) >
> - prev_dc : read_dc_counter(data->debugfs_fd, CHECK_DC5) >
> + igt_skip_on_f(!(igt_wait(read_dc_counter(data->debugfs_fd,
> +dc_target) >
> prev_dc, 3000, 100)), "Unable to enters shallow DC states\n");
> dpms_on(data);
> cleanup_dc_dpms(data);
> @@ -417,20 +431,26 @@ static void setup_dc9_dpms(data_t *data, int
> prev_dc, bool dc6_supported)
>
> static void test_dc9_dpms(data_t *data) {
> - bool dc6_supported;
> + int prev_dc, dc_target, sysfs_fd;
>
> + igt_require((sysfs_fd = open(KMS_POLL_PATH, O_WRONLY)) >= 0);
> require_dc_counter(data->debugfs_fd, CHECK_DC5);
> - dc6_supported = support_dc6(data->debugfs_fd);
> - setup_dc9_dpms(data, dc6_supported ? read_dc_counter(data->debugfs_fd, CHECK_DC6) :
> - read_dc_counter(data->debugfs_fd, CHECK_DC5), dc6_supported);
> + dc_target = support_dc6(data->debugfs_fd) ? CHECK_DC6 : CHECK_DC5;
> + setup_dc9_dpms(data, dc_target, sysfs_fd);
> + prev_dc = read_dc_counter(data->debugfs_fd, dc_target);
> dpms_off(data);
> - igt_assert_f(check_dc9(data->debugfs_fd, dc6_supported ?
> - read_dc_counter(data->debugfs_fd, CHECK_DC6) :
> - read_dc_counter(data->debugfs_fd, CHECK_DC5),
> - dc6_supported, 3000), "Not in DC9\n");
> + check_dc9(data, dc_target, prev_dc);
> dpms_on(data);
> }
>
> +static void kms_poll_reset(int sig)
> +{
> + int sysfs_fd;
> +
> + igt_require((sysfs_fd = open(KMS_POLL_PATH, O_WRONLY)) >= 0);
> + igt_sysfs_set_boolean(sysfs_fd, KMS_POLL_PATH,
> +kms_poll_saved_state);
Don't call igt_require in an exit handler, there's no setjmp done for it to jump to. You can just if () that sysfs write.
--
Petri Latvala
Hi Petri,
Thanks I will update on next revision with if statement.
Thanks and regards,
Jigar Bhatt
> +}
> +
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("These tests validate Display Power DC states");
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> @@ -453,6 +473,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> data.msr_fd = open("/dev/cpu/0/msr", O_RDONLY);
> igt_assert_f(data.msr_fd >= 0,
> "Can't open /dev/cpu/0/msr.\n");
> + igt_install_exit_handler(kms_poll_reset);
> }
>
> igt_describe("In this test we make sure that system enters DC3CO "
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list