[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for i915/i915_pm_rps: Don't use gem_write in batch_create

[Karolina Drobnik]

Hi Lakshmi,

I'm sorry, I forgot to include you in my reply to the BAT failure.

I think this failure is unrelated to my patch, but could you 
double-check and re-run this series?

Thanks a lot,
Karolina

On 05.08.2022 09:14, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
> On 04.08.2022 16:13, Patchwork wrote:
>> *Patch Details*
>> *Series:*    i915/i915_pm_rps: Don't use gem_write in batch_create
>> *URL:*    https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/106977/ 
>> <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/106977/>
>> *State:*    failure
>> *Details:* 
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_7606/index.html 
>> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_7606/index.html>
>>
>>
>>   CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11966 -> IGTPW_7606
>>
>>
>>     Summary
>>
>> *FAILURE*
>>
>> Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_7606 absolutely need to be
>> verified manually.
>>
>> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>> introduced in IGTPW_7606, please notify your bug team to allow them
>> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives 
>> in CI.
>>
>> External URL: 
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_7606/index.html
>>
>>
>>     Participating hosts (41 -> 41)
>>
>> Additional (3): bat-rpls-1 bat-jsl-3 bat-dg2-8
>> Missing (3): fi-kbl-soraka fi-rkl-11600 bat-dg1-5
>>
>>
>>     Possible new issues
>>
>> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_7606:
>>
>>
>>       IGT changes
>>
>>
>>         Possible regressions
>>
>>   * igt at gem_render_tiled_blits@basic:
>>       o fi-apl-guc: PASS
>>         
>> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11966/fi-apl-guc/igt@gem_render_tiled_blits@basic.html> 
>>
>>         -> INCOMPLETE
>>         
>> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_7606/fi-apl-guc/igt@gem_render_tiled_blits@basic.html> 
>>
> 
> Failure not related to the changes in my patch
> 
> Many thanks,
> Karolina