[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/i915/api_intel_allocator: Fixed start offset
Zbigniew Kempczyński
zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com
Tue Dec 20 20:40:13 UTC 2022
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:07:17AM +0100, Dominik Karol Piatkowski wrote:
> It is safer to use intel_allocator_get_address_range than arbitrary
> hardcoded start offset that may be too low.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Karol Piatkowski <dominik.karol.piatkowski at intel.com>
^
+----- why there's missing ą?
--
Zbigniew
> Cc: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/api_intel_allocator.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/api_intel_allocator.c b/tests/i915/api_intel_allocator.c
> index 87abd900..e9039a21 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/api_intel_allocator.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/api_intel_allocator.c
> @@ -96,9 +96,10 @@ static void reserve_simple(int fd)
> static void reserve(int fd, uint8_t type)
> {
> struct test_obj obj;
> - uint64_t ahnd, offset = 0x40000, size = 0x1000;
> + uint64_t ahnd, offset, size = 0x1000;
>
> ahnd = intel_allocator_open(fd, 0, type);
> + intel_allocator_get_address_range(ahnd, &offset, NULL);
>
> igt_assert_eq(intel_allocator_reserve(ahnd, 0, size, offset), true);
> /* try overlapping won't succeed */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list