[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: i915_pm_rpm : Dump i915_runtime_pm_status

[Dixit, Ashutosh]

On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:13:14 -0800, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
>
> Dump i915_runtime_pm_status conditionally whenever runtime pm status
> got active and it was expected to be suspended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c
> index 648b0cffb..d1ba69af4 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c
> @@ -201,10 +201,17 @@ static bool wait_for_pc8_status(enum pc8_status status)
>
>  static bool wait_for_suspended(void)
>  {
> -	if (has_pc8 && !has_runtime_pm)
> +	bool suspended = false;

Nit but maybe let's move this into the else, I'll move and merge it:

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>

> +
> +	if (has_pc8 && !has_runtime_pm) {
>		return wait_for_pc8_status(PC8_ENABLED);
> -	else
> -		return igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_SUSPENDED);
> +	} else {
> +		suspended = igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_SUSPENDED);
> +		if (!suspended)
> +			igt_debugfs_dump(drm_fd, "i915_runtime_pm_status");
> +
> +		return suspended;
> +	}
>  }
>
>  static bool wait_for_active(void)
> --
> 2.26.2
>