[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_psr2_sf: Add new testcases for moving plane
Souza, Jose
jose.souza at intel.com
Tue Feb 22 16:38:45 UTC 2022
On Tue, 2022-02-22 at 12:38 +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> Add new testcases which are moving cursor and overlay planes
> without setting any damage areas.
>
> Cursor testcase is reproducing following bug:
>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5077
>
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/kms_psr2_sf.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/kms_psr2_sf.c b/tests/i915/kms_psr2_sf.c
> index 36f8a786..b9990f87 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/kms_psr2_sf.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/kms_psr2_sf.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Tests to varify PSR2 selective fetch by sending multiple"
> enum operations {
> PLANE_UPDATE,
> PLANE_UPDATE_CONTINUOUS,
> + PLANE_MOVE_DAMAGED,
Missing more explanation in the commit message, please split each change in a single patch.
I see here a patch for this new PLANE_MOVE_DAMAGED and another adding the negative positions...
Anyhow, I don't think we need PLANE_MOVE_DAMAGED.
One of the differences between it and PLANE_MOVE is set_clip(&data->plane_move_clip) that is wrong, the damaged property is based on the plane
coordinates.
> PLANE_MOVE,
> OVERLAY_PRIM_UPDATE
> };
> @@ -51,7 +52,9 @@ enum plane_move_postion {
> POS_TOP_LEFT,
> POS_TOP_RIGHT,
> POS_BOTTOM_LEFT,
> - POS_BOTTOM_RIGHT
> + POS_BOTTOM_RIGHT,
> + POS_BOTTOM_LEFT_NEGATIVE,
> + POS_TOP_RIGHT_NEGATIVE,
> };
>
> typedef struct {
> @@ -74,6 +77,7 @@ typedef struct {
> igt_plane_t *test_plane;
> cairo_t *cr;
> uint32_t screen_changes;
> + int cur_x, cur_y;
> } data_t;
>
> static const char *op_str(enum operations op)
> @@ -81,7 +85,8 @@ static const char *op_str(enum operations op)
> static const char * const name[] = {
> [PLANE_UPDATE] = "plane-update",
> [PLANE_UPDATE_CONTINUOUS] = "plane-update-continuous",
> - [PLANE_MOVE] = "plane-move",
> + [PLANE_MOVE] = "plane-move-without-damage",
> + [PLANE_MOVE_DAMAGED] = "plane-move",
> [OVERLAY_PRIM_UPDATE] = "overlay-primary-update",
> };
>
> @@ -187,7 +192,7 @@ static void plane_update_setup_squares(data_t *data, igt_fb_t *fb, uint32_t h,
> }
> }
>
> -static void plane_move_setup_square(data_t *data, igt_fb_t *fb, uint32_t h,
> +static void plane_move_damaged_setup_square(data_t *data, igt_fb_t *fb, uint32_t h,
> uint32_t v)
> {
> int x = 0, y = 0;
> @@ -260,8 +265,8 @@ static void prepare(data_t *data)
>
> data->fb_continuous = &data->fb_overlay;
>
> - if (data->op == PLANE_MOVE) {
> - plane_move_setup_square(data, &data->fb_test,
> + if (data->op == PLANE_MOVE_DAMAGED) {
> + plane_move_damaged_setup_square(data, &data->fb_test,
> data->mode->hdisplay/2,
> data->mode->vdisplay/2);
>
> @@ -273,6 +278,7 @@ static void prepare(data_t *data)
>
> igt_plane_set_fb(sprite, &data->fb_overlay);
> data->test_plane = sprite;
> +
> break;
>
> case DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY:
> @@ -335,6 +341,8 @@ static void prepare(data_t *data)
> igt_assert(false);
> }
>
> + data->cur_x = data->cur_y = 0;
> +
> igt_plane_set_fb(primary, &data->fb_primary);
>
> igt_display_commit2(&data->display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> @@ -378,7 +386,7 @@ static void plane_update_expected_output(int plane_type, int box_count,
> manual(expected);
> }
>
> -static void plane_move_expected_output(enum plane_move_postion pos)
> +static void plane_move_damaged_expected_output(enum plane_move_postion pos)
> {
> char expected[64] = {};
>
> @@ -406,6 +414,42 @@ static void plane_move_expected_output(enum plane_move_postion pos)
> manual(expected);
> }
>
> +static void plane_move_expected_output(enum plane_move_postion pos)
> +{
> + char expected[73] = {};
> +
> + switch (pos) {
> + case POS_TOP_LEFT:
> + sprintf(expected,
> + "screen Green with Blue box on top left corner");
> + break;
> + case POS_TOP_RIGHT:
> + sprintf(expected,
> + "screen Green with Blue box on top right corner");
> + break;
> + case POS_BOTTOM_LEFT:
> + sprintf(expected,
> + "screen Green with Blue box on bottom left corner");
> + break;
> + case POS_BOTTOM_RIGHT:
> + sprintf(expected,
> + "screen Green with Blue box on bottom right corner");
> + break;
> + case POS_BOTTOM_LEFT_NEGATIVE:
> + sprintf(expected,
> + "screen Green with Blue box on bottom left corner (partly exceeding area)");
> + break;
> + case POS_TOP_RIGHT_NEGATIVE:
> + sprintf(expected,
> + "screen Green with Blue box on top right corner (partly exceeding area)");
> + break;
> + default:
> + igt_assert(false);
> + }
> +
> + manual(expected);
> +}
Another unexpected changed, you changed the visual output of a current subtest, why?
> +
> static void overlay_prim_update_expected_output(int box_count)
> {
> char expected[64] = {};
> @@ -421,6 +465,9 @@ static void overlay_prim_update_expected_output(int box_count)
> static void expected_output(data_t *data)
> {
> switch (data->op) {
> + case PLANE_MOVE_DAMAGED:
> + plane_move_damaged_expected_output(data->pos);
> + break;
> case PLANE_MOVE:
> plane_move_expected_output(data->pos);
> break;
> @@ -487,6 +534,59 @@ static void damaged_plane_move(data_t *data)
> expected_output(data);
> }
>
> +static void plane_move(data_t *data)
> +{
> + int target_x, target_y;
> +
> + switch (data->pos) {
> + case POS_TOP_LEFT:
> + target_x = 0;
> + target_y = 0;
> + break;
> + case POS_TOP_RIGHT:
> + target_x = data->mode->hdisplay - data->fb_test.width;
> + target_y = 0;
> + break;
> + case POS_TOP_RIGHT_NEGATIVE:
> + target_x = data->mode->hdisplay - data->fb_test.width;
> + target_y = -data->fb_test.width / 2;
> + break;
> + case POS_BOTTOM_LEFT:
> + target_x = 0;
> + target_y = data->mode->vdisplay - data->fb_test.height;
> + break;
> + case POS_BOTTOM_LEFT_NEGATIVE:
> + target_x = -data->fb_test.width / 2;
> + target_y = data->mode->vdisplay - data->fb_test.height;
> + break;
> + case POS_BOTTOM_RIGHT:
> + target_x = data->mode->hdisplay - data->fb_test.width;
> + target_y = data->mode->vdisplay - data->fb_test.height;
> + break;
> + default:
> + igt_assert(false);
> + }
> +
> + while (data->cur_x != target_x || data->cur_y != target_y) {
> + if (data->cur_x < target_x)
> + data->cur_x += min(target_x - data->cur_x, 20);
> + else if (data->cur_x > target_x)
> + data->cur_x -= min(data->cur_x - target_x, 20);
> +
> + if (data->cur_y < target_y)
> + data->cur_y += min(target_y - data->cur_y, 20);
> + else if (data->cur_y > target_y)
> + data->cur_y -= min(data->cur_y - target_y, 20);
> +
> + igt_plane_set_position(data->test_plane, data->cur_x, data->cur_y);
> + igt_display_commit2(&data->display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
what is this? why do atomic commits in loop until reach target?
another change that if necessary should go to another patch as this is changing a current subtest.
> + }
> +
> + igt_assert(psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_2));
> +
> + expected_output(data);
> +}
> +
> static void damaged_plane_update(data_t *data)
> {
> igt_plane_t *test_plane = data->test_plane;
> @@ -526,6 +626,8 @@ static void damaged_plane_update(data_t *data)
>
> static void run(data_t *data)
> {
> + int i;
> +
> igt_assert(psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_2));
>
> data->screen_changes = 0;
> @@ -542,9 +644,15 @@ static void run(data_t *data)
> damaged_plane_update(data);
> }
> break;
> - case PLANE_MOVE:
> + case PLANE_MOVE_DAMAGED:
> damaged_plane_move(data);
> break;
> + case PLANE_MOVE:
> + for (i = POS_TOP_LEFT; i <= POS_TOP_RIGHT_NEGATIVE; i++) {
> + data->pos = i;
> + plane_move(data);
Another unexpected change.
> + }
> + break;
> default:
> igt_assert(false);
> }
> @@ -654,10 +762,20 @@ igt_main
> cleanup(&data);
> }
>
> - /* Only for overlay plane */
> data.op = PLANE_MOVE;
> /* Verify overlay plane move selective fetch */
> igt_describe("Test that selective fetch works on moving overlay plane");
overlay != cursor
> + igt_subtest_f("cursor-%s-sf", op_str(data.op)) {
> + data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR;
> + prepare(&data);
> + run(&data);
> + cleanup(&data);
> + }
> +
> + /* Only for overlay plane */
> + data.op = PLANE_MOVE_DAMAGED;
> + /* Verify overlay plane move selective fetch */
> + igt_describe("Test that selective fetch works on moving overlay plane");
> igt_subtest_f("%s-sf-dmg-area", op_str(data.op)) {
> for (i = POS_TOP_LEFT; i <= POS_BOTTOM_RIGHT ; i++) {
> data.pos = i;
> @@ -668,6 +786,16 @@ igt_main
> }
> }
>
> + data.op = PLANE_MOVE;
> + /* Verify overlay plane move selective fetch */
> + igt_describe("Test that selective fetch works on moving overlay plane");
> + igt_subtest_f("overlay-%s-sf", op_str(data.op)) {
> + data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY;
> + prepare(&data);
> + run(&data);
> + cleanup(&data);
> + }
> +
> /* Verify primary plane selective fetch with overplay plane blended */
> data.op = OVERLAY_PRIM_UPDATE;
> igt_describe("Test that selective fetch works on primary plane "
There is a few code style errors.
Other thing that you need to pay attention is the patch diff, saw some new line being added to a function that is not being changed.
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list