[igt-dev] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 09/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Remove reliance on context persistance

[Matthew Brost]

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:59:41AM -0800, John.C.Harrison at Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> 
> The hang test was relying on context persitence for no particular
> reason. That is, it would set a bunch of background spinners running
> then immediately destroy the active contexts but expect the spinners
> to keep spinning. With the current implementation of context
> persistence in i915, that means that super high priority pings are
> sent to each engine at the start of the test. Depending upon the
> timing and platform, one of those unexpected pings could cause test
> failures.
> 
> There is no need to require context persitence in this test. So change
> to managing the contexts cleanly and only destroying them when they
> are no longer in use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/i915/i915_hangman.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c b/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
> index 918418760..6601db5f6 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
> @@ -289,27 +289,29 @@ test_engine_hang(const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
>  		 const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
>  {
>  	const struct intel_execution_engine2 *other;
> -	const intel_ctx_t *tmp_ctx;
> +	const intel_ctx_t *local_ctx[GEM_MAX_ENGINES];

This is fine for now as GEM_MAX_ENGINES is relatively small but what if
we change this to large value, let's say 4k? I think the stack could
overflow then. Maybe not a concern, maybe it is? I'll leave this up to
if this should be kmalloc'd or not in the next rev.

Everything else looks good.

With that:
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>

>  	igt_spin_t *spin, *next;
>  	IGT_LIST_HEAD(list);
>  	uint64_t ahnd = get_reloc_ahnd(device, ctx->id), ahndN;
> +	int num_ctx;
>  
>  	igt_skip_on(flags & IGT_SPIN_INVALID_CS &&
>  		    gem_engine_has_cmdparser(device, &ctx->cfg, e->flags));
>  
>  	/* Fill all the other engines with background load */
> +	num_ctx = 0;
>  	for_each_ctx_engine(device, ctx, other) {
>  		if (other->flags == e->flags)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		tmp_ctx = intel_ctx_create(device, &ctx->cfg);
> -		ahndN = get_reloc_ahnd(device, tmp_ctx->id);
> +		local_ctx[num_ctx] = intel_ctx_create(device, &ctx->cfg);
> +		ahndN = get_reloc_ahnd(device, local_ctx[num_ctx]->id);
>  		spin = __igt_spin_new(device,
>  				      .ahnd = ahndN,
> -				      .ctx = tmp_ctx,
> +				      .ctx = local_ctx[num_ctx],
>  				      .engine = other->flags,
>  				      .flags = IGT_SPIN_FENCE_OUT);
> -		intel_ctx_destroy(device, tmp_ctx);
> +		num_ctx++;
>  
>  		igt_list_move(&spin->link, &list);
>  	}
> @@ -339,7 +341,10 @@ test_engine_hang(const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
>  		igt_spin_free(device, spin);
>  		put_ahnd(ahndN);
>  	}
> +
>  	put_ahnd(ahnd);
> +	while (num_ctx)
> +		intel_ctx_destroy(device, local_ctx[--num_ctx]);
>  
>  	check_alive();
>  }
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>