[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Add softpin flag for no-reloc path
Kamil Konieczny
kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Tue Jul 19 10:12:02 UTC 2022
On 2022-07-19 at 09:24:50 +0200, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> As Chris noticed semaphore object doesn't have EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED flag.
> It is likely not a problem as we provide offsets from reloc allocator
> thus there's no risk of overlapping offsets. But for purity ensure
> we passed pinned flag when we're in softpin mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
lgtm,
Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> index 1e385bebc7..39e9fc5fef 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -861,6 +861,7 @@ __sema_busy(int gem_fd, uint64_t ahnd, int pmu, const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
> .handle = create_sema(gem_fd, ahnd, reloc, &obj.offset),
> .relocation_count = !ahnd ? 2 : 0,
> .relocs_ptr = to_user_pointer(reloc),
> + .flags = !ahnd ? 0 : EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED,
> };
> struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
> .batch_start_offset = 64,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list