[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule: Run spinner in non-default context
Kamil Konieczny
kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Tue Jun 7 09:13:18 UTC 2022
On 2022-06-07 at 10:31:59 +0200, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> Engine passed to the subtest comes from configuration which is build
> on top of all-physical-engines context. Add dedicated context for
> the spinner which is compatibile with this engine.
>
> Fixes: pi-shared-iova and pi-distinct-iova
>
> Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
> Cc: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c
> index cf2625cbf5..43d9d06c09 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c
> @@ -2703,6 +2703,7 @@ static void test_pi_iova(int i915, const intel_ctx_cfg_t *cfg,
> unsigned int engine, unsigned int flags)
> {
> intel_ctx_cfg_t ufd_cfg = *cfg;
> + const intel_ctx_t *spinctx;
> struct uffdio_api api = { .api = UFFD_API };
> struct uffdio_register reg;
> struct uffdio_copy copy;
> @@ -2712,7 +2713,7 @@ static void test_pi_iova(int i915, const intel_ctx_cfg_t *cfg,
> pthread_t hi, lo;
> char poison[4096];
> int ufd;
> - uint64_t ahnd = get_reloc_ahnd(i915, 0);
> + uint64_t ahnd;
>
> /*
> * In this scenario, we have a pair of contending contexts that
> @@ -2740,6 +2741,8 @@ static void test_pi_iova(int i915, const intel_ctx_cfg_t *cfg,
> if ((flags & SHARED) && gem_uses_full_ppgtt(i915))
> ufd_cfg.vm = gem_vm_create(i915);
>
> + spinctx = intel_ctx_create(i915, cfg);
> + ahnd = get_reloc_ahnd(i915, spinctx->id);
> t.i915 = i915;
> t.cfg = &ufd_cfg;
> t.engine = engine;
> @@ -2782,7 +2785,7 @@ static void test_pi_iova(int i915, const intel_ctx_cfg_t *cfg,
> * the local tasklet will not run until after all signals have been
> * delivered... but another tasklet might).
> */
> - spin = igt_spin_new(i915, .ahnd = ahnd, .engine = engine);
> + spin = igt_spin_new(i915, .ahnd = ahnd, .ctx = spinctx, .engine = engine);
> for (int i = 0; i < MAX_ELSP_QLEN; i++) {
> const intel_ctx_t *ctx = create_highest_priority(i915, cfg);
> spin->execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx->id;
> @@ -2815,6 +2818,7 @@ static void test_pi_iova(int i915, const intel_ctx_cfg_t *cfg,
> pthread_mutex_unlock(&t.mutex);
> igt_debugfs_dump(i915, "i915_engine_info");
> igt_spin_free(i915, spin);
> + intel_ctx_destroy(i915, spinctx);
> put_offset(ahnd, t.scratch);
> put_offset(ahnd, t.batch);
> put_ahnd(ahnd);
> --
> 2.32.0
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list