[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] i915/gem_eio: Exercise object creation while wedged

[Dixit, Ashutosh]

On Thu, 03 Mar 2022 06:06:35 -0800, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
>
> diff --git a/lib/i915/gem_memory_topology.h b/lib/i915/gem_memory_topology.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..8daec8b5b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/i915/gem_memory_topology.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2021 Intel Corporation
> + *
> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
> + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
> + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
> + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
> + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> + *
> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
> + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
> + * Software.
> + *
> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL
> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
> + * IN THE SOFTWARE.
> + */

Can we please replace these headers with SPDX headers (note SPDX headers
for .c and .h files are different but we have plenty in the code).

> +
> +#ifndef GEM_MEMORY_TOPOLOGY_H
> +#define GEM_MEMORY_TOPOLOGY_H
> +
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
> +#include "i915_drm.h"
> +
> +struct gem_memory_region {
> +	struct gem_memory_region *next;
> +	char *name;
> +
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance ci;
> +	uint64_t size;
> +};
> +
> +struct gem_memory_region *__gem_get_memory_regions(int i915);
> +struct gem_memory_region *
> +__gem_next_memory_region(struct gem_memory_region *r);
> +
> +#define for_each_memory_region(r__, fd__) for (struct gem_memory_region *r__ = __gem_get_memory_regions(fd__); r__; r__ = __gem_next_memory_region(r__))

Let me ask about this too on the mailing list. We already have equivalent
functionality using get_memory_region_set()/for_each_combination(), the
macros introduced here are actually simpler. But any objection to
introducing these since we already have equivalent functionality?