[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 3/6] lib/igt_kmod: improve audio unbind logic
Andi Shyti
andi.shyti at linux.intel.com
Thu May 5 16:44:43 UTC 2022
Hi Mauro,
> +static struct module_ref *read_module_dependencies(unsigned int *num_mod)
> +{
> + FILE *fp = fopen("/proc/modules", "r");
> + struct module_ref *mod = NULL;
> + size_t line_buf_size = 0;
> + char *required_by, *p;
> + unsigned n_mod = 0;
> + unsigned num_req;
> + char *line = NULL;
> + int len = 0;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + igt_assert(fp);
> +
> + while ((len = getline(&line, &line_buf_size, fp)) > 0) {
> + mod = realloc(mod, (n_mod + 1) * sizeof(*mod));
> + igt_assert(mod);
> + mod[n_mod].required_by = NULL;
> +
> + p = strtok(line, " ");
> + mod[n_mod].name = strdup(p);
> +
> + p = strtok(NULL, " ");
> + ret = sscanf(p, "%lu", &mod[n_mod].mem);
> + igt_assert(ret == 1);
> +
> + p = strtok(NULL, " ");
> + ret = sscanf(p, "%u", &mod[n_mod].ref_count);
> + igt_assert(ret == 1);
> +
> + num_req = 0;
> + required_by = strtok(NULL, " ");
> + if (strcmp(required_by, "-")) {
> + p = strtok(required_by, ",");
> + while (p) {
> + for (i = 0; i < n_mod; i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(p, mod[i].name))
> + break;
> + }
brackets not needed here
> + igt_assert(i < n_mod);
> +
> + mod[n_mod].required_by = realloc(mod[n_mod].required_by,
> + (num_req + 1) * sizeof(unsigned int));
> + mod[n_mod].required_by[num_req] = i;
> + num_req++;
> + p = strtok(NULL, ",");
> + }
> + }
> + mod[n_mod].num_required = num_req;
> + n_mod++;
> + }
> + free(line);
> + fclose(fp);
> +
> + *num_mod = n_mod;
> + return mod;
> +}
it looks correct, haven't spotted any error in this function, but
I admit that string parsing can be complex. I trust you have
tested it properly. I will check it again, though.
[...]
> +#define LINUX_VERSION(major, minor, patch) \
> + ((major) << 16 | (minor) << 8 | (patch))
I can't believe that the glibc is not providing anything similar.
> +
> +
you have an extra line here
> +static int linux_kernel_version(void)
> +{
> + struct utsname utsname;
> + int ver[3] = { 0 };
[...]
> +
> +int igt_audio_driver_unload(const char **who)
ha! this confused me because I start reading from the bottom and
I didn't notice the above
-int igt_audio_driver_unload(const char **who)
+static int igt_always_unload_audio_driver(const char **who)
> +{
> + unsigned int num_mod, i, j;
> + struct module_ref *mod;
> + int pos = -1;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * On older Kernels, there's no way to check if the audio driver
> + * binds into the DRM one. So, always remove audio drivers that
> + * might be binding.
> + */
> + if (linux_kernel_version() < LINUX_VERSION(5, 20, 0))
> + return igt_always_unload_audio_driver(who);
... so that this one becomes what you did in patch 1.
> +
> + /*
> + * Newer Kernels gained support for showing the dependencies between
> + * audio and DRM drivers via /proc/modules and lsmod. Use it to
> + * detect if removing the audio driver is needed, properly unloading
> + * any audio processes that could be using the audio driver and
> + * handling module dependencies. Such solution should be generic
> + * enough to work with newer SOC/SOF drivers if ever needed.
> + */
> +
> + mod = read_module_dependencies(&num_mod);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_mod; i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(mod[i].name, "i915")) {
> + break;
> + }
> + }
no need for brackets here.
> +
> + if (i == num_mod)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Recursively remove all drivers that depend on i915 */
> + for (j = 0; j < mod[i].num_required; j++) {
> + pos = mod[i].required_by[j];
> + if (who)
> + *who = strdup(mod[pos].name);
> + /*
> + * If a sound driver depends on i915, kill audio processes
> + * first, in order to make it possible to unload the driver
> + */
> + if (strstr(mod[pos].name, "snd")) {
> + if (igt_lsof_kill_audio_processes()) {
> + ret = 1;
is this a boolean function? Shall we choose some proper errnos?
> + goto ret;
do we need to free who here...
> + }
> + }
> + ret = igt_unload_driver(mod, num_mod, pos);
... and here?
And here... do we need to handle the error?
> + }
> +
> +ret:
> + free_module_ref(mod, num_mod);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
Thanks,
Andi
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list