[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for tests/kms: IGT test cleanup (rev3)

[Modem, Bhanuprakash]

Hi Lakshmi,

On Tue-17-05-2022 07:09 pm, Patchwork wrote:
> *Patch Details*
> *Series:*	tests/kms: IGT test cleanup (rev3)
> *URL:*	https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104029/ 
> <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104029/>
> *State:*	failure
> *Details:* 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_7120/index.html 
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_7120/index.html>
> 
> 
>   CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11664 -> IGTPW_7120
> 
> 
>     Summary
> 
> *FAILURE*
> 
> Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_7120 absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
> 
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in IGTPW_7120, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_7120/index.html
> 
> 
>     Participating hosts (41 -> 42)
> 
> Additional (1): bat-dg2-8
> 
> 
>     Possible new issues
> 
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_7120:
> 
> 
>       IGT changes
> 
> 
>         Possible regressions
> 
>   *
> 
>     igt at kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank at a-hdmi-a2:
> 
>       o fi-skl-guc: PASS
>         <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11664/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank@a-hdmi-a2.html>
>         -> DMESG-WARN
>         <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_7120/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank@a-hdmi-a2.html>
>         +3 similar issues

These failures are not related to this patch series.

>   *
> 
>     {igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@hang-read-crc} (NEW):
> 
>       o bat-dg1-5: NOTRUN -> SKIP
>         <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_7120/bat-dg1-5/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@hang-read-crc.html>
>         +1 similar issue

As we introduced dynamic subtests, these Skips are expected on "No 
display" configs.

Can you please re-report this false positive?

- Bhanu
> 
>