[igt-dev] [PATCH][V3] tests/kms_plane_multiple: turn off pipe if all planes are off
Karthik B S
karthik.b.s at intel.com
Fri Oct 7 05:51:31 UTC 2022
Hi,
This is a new issue which is seen with this patch.
We are seeing a failure in pipe_crc_start when this patch is added.
(kms_plane_multiple:5716) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure
function igt_pipe_crc_start, file
../../../usr/src/igt-gpu-tools/lib/igt_debugfs.c:884:
(kms_plane_multiple:5716) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Failed assertion:
pipe_crc->crc_fd != -1
This is because the pipe is off when we're trying to do pipe_crc_start
with this patch.
This is hitting only on i915 because of the below code, where we start
pipe crc before the next commit specifically for i915 devices.
For other devices, the pipe_crc_start is after the next commit and this
is the reason we don’t see any issue there.
/* Intel devices need it here, timing sensitive on few devices */
if (is_i915_device(data->drm_fd))
igt_pipe_crc_start(data->pipe_crc);
/* randomize planes and set up the holes */
prepare_planes(data, pipe, &blue, modifier, c, output);
igt_display_commit2(&data->display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
if (!is_i915_device(data->drm_fd))
igt_pipe_crc_start(data->pipe_crc);
IMHO, this patch needs to be reworked to work with i915 devices.
Regards,
Karthik.B.S
On 10/7/2022 11:03 AM, Vudum, Lakshminarayana wrote:
> +Karthik and Vandita.
>
> Lakshmi.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Yacoub<markyacoub at chromium.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2022 8:34 AM
> To: Vudum, Lakshminarayana<lakshminarayana.vudum at intel.com>
> Cc:igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org;michel.daenzer at mailbox.org; Alex Hung<alex.hung at amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH][V3] tests/kms_plane_multiple: turn off pipe if all planes are off
>
> Hi Lakshminarayana, I have a feeling that this might be an intel bug - the code is pretty straightforward and works on amdpgu. we have a feeling that i915 might be missing something.
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 12:25 PM Alex Hung<alex.hung at amd.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> As expected, the rev 3 has kms_plane_multiple failures on CI.IGT
>> unlike rev 2 which has "is_amdgpu_device()" on the first set_pipe, and
>> the failures are as below. The first set_pipe required by amdgpu is
>> not needed on all devices.
>>
>> (kms_plane_multiple:1581) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure
>> function igt_pipe_crc_start, file
>> ../../../usr/src/igt-gpu-tools/lib/igt_debugfs.c:884:
>> (kms_plane_multiple:1581) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Failed assertion:
>> pipe_crc->crc_fd != -1
>> (kms_plane_multiple:1581) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Last errno: 5,
>> Input/output error
>>
>> The Fi.CI.IGT results are available on
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/109086/
>>
>>
>> On 2022-09-29 14:06, Alex Hung wrote:
>>> amdgpu rejects when crtc is on + all planes are off, and it is
>>> necessary to turn off crtc when all planes are off in the subtest
>>> "tiling-none".
>>>
>>> This is revised fromhttps://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/80904/
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung<alex.hung at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> V2 - remove second is_amdgpu_device() before setting PIPE_NONE
>>>
>>> V3 - remove both is_amdgpu_device() before setting PIPE_NONE
>>>
>>> tests/kms_plane_multiple.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/kms_plane_multiple.c b/tests/kms_plane_multiple.c
>>> index cbe8c189..6c0bc36d 100644
>>> --- a/tests/kms_plane_multiple.c
>>> +++ b/tests/kms_plane_multiple.c
>>> @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ test_plane_position_with_output(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
>>> for_each_plane_on_pipe(&data->display, pipe, plane)
>>> igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
>>>
>>> + igt_output_set_pipe(output, PIPE_NONE);
>>> igt_display_commit2(&data->display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
>>>
>>> for (int x = 0; x < c; x++) @@ -344,6 +345,7 @@
>>> test_plane_position_with_output(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
>>> for_each_plane_on_pipe(&data->display, pipe, plane)
>>> igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
>>>
>>> + igt_output_set_pipe(output, PIPE_NONE);
>>> igt_display_commit2(&data->display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
>>>
>>> for (int x = 0; x < c; x++)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev/attachments/20221007/91d537a8/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list