[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/i915_pm_dc: Fix dc9-dpms test on MTL

Kamil Konieczny kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Thu Aug 24 18:05:01 UTC 2023


Hi,

On 2023-08-25 at 02:37:18 +0530, Thasleem, Mohammed wrote:
> From: "Mohammed Thasleem" <mohammed.thasleem at intel.com>
> 
> DC5 counter on MTL is not expected to get reset in DC9 state.

This is fine.

> Add condition to check runtime_suspended_time value to validate
> DC9 dpms test.

I do not see any new condition, I do see you extendeded comment
there. With second sentence removed:

Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Thasleem <mohammed.thasleem at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c
> index 90fe847fc..13ae31583 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
>  #define KMS_HELPER "/sys/module/drm_kms_helper/parameters/"
>  #define PACKAGE_CSTATE_PATH  "pmc_core/package_cstate_show"
>  #define KMS_POLL_DISABLE 0
> -#define DC9_RESETS_DC_COUNTERS(devid) (!(IS_DG1(devid) || IS_DG2(devid)))
> +#define DC9_RESETS_DC_COUNTERS(devid) (!(IS_DG1(devid) || IS_DG2(devid) || IS_METEORLAKE(devid)))
>  
>  IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Tests to validate display power DC states.");
>  
> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static bool dc9_wait_entry(data_t *data, int dc_target, int prev_dc, int prev_rp
>  	 * Runtime suspended residency should increment once DC9 is achieved;
>  	 * this condition is valid for all platforms.
>  	 * However, resetting of dc5/dc6 counter to check if display engine was in DC9;
> -	 * this condition at present can be skipped for dg1 and dg2 platforms.
> +	 * this condition at present can be skipped for dg1, dg2 and MTL platforms.
>  	 */
>  	return igt_wait((read_runtime_suspended_time(data->drm_fd) > prev_rpm) &&
>  			(!DC9_RESETS_DC_COUNTERS(data->devid) ||
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


More information about the igt-dev mailing list