[PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/xe_ioctl: fix default cpu_caching helper
Francois Dugast
francois.dugast at intel.com
Mon Dec 11 11:41:49 UTC 2023
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:58:43AM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> The placement and flags were split in some recent refactoring, but looks
> like we forgot to update __xe_default_cpu_caching_from_placement to
> account for flags and placement. In particular we are no longer
> considering the FLAG_SCANOUT here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast at intel.com>
> ---
> lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c | 6 +++---
> lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h | 2 +-
> tests/intel/xe_create.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
> index 8b12c0369..cdad3d7e2 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
> @@ -230,10 +230,10 @@ void xe_vm_destroy(int fd, uint32_t vm)
> igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_VM_DESTROY, &destroy), 0);
> }
>
> -uint16_t __xe_default_cpu_caching_from_placement(int fd, uint32_t placement)
> +uint16_t __xe_default_cpu_caching(int fd, uint32_t placement, uint32_t flags)
> {
> if ((placement & all_memory_regions(fd)) != system_memory(fd) ||
> - placement & DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_SCANOUT)
> + flags & DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_SCANOUT)
> /* VRAM placements or scanout should always use WC */
> return DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WC;
>
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static uint32_t ___xe_bo_create(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t pla
> uint32_t __xe_bo_create(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t placement,
> uint32_t flags, uint32_t *handle)
> {
> - uint16_t cpu_caching = __xe_default_cpu_caching_from_placement(fd, placement);
> + uint16_t cpu_caching = __xe_default_cpu_caching(fd, placement, flags);
>
> return ___xe_bo_create(fd, vm, size, placement, flags, cpu_caching, handle);
> }
> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
> index bbfa40391..c8d46fb29 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ uint32_t __xe_bo_create_caching(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t pla
> uint32_t flags, uint16_t cpu_caching, uint32_t *handle);
> uint32_t xe_bo_create_caching(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t placement,
> uint32_t flags, uint16_t cpu_caching);
> -uint16_t __xe_default_cpu_caching_from_placement(int fd, uint32_t placement);
> +uint16_t __xe_default_cpu_caching(int fd, uint32_t placement, uint32_t flags);
> int __xe_exec_queue_create(int fd, uint32_t vm,
> struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *instance,
> uint64_t ext, uint32_t *exec_queue_id);
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_create.c b/tests/intel/xe_create.c
> index 64eadc734..1ed48a5d3 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_create.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_create.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int __create_bo(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t placement,
> struct drm_xe_gem_create create = {
> .vm_id = vm,
> .size = size,
> - .cpu_caching = __xe_default_cpu_caching_from_placement(fd, placement),
> + .cpu_caching = __xe_default_cpu_caching(fd, placement, 0),
> .placement = placement,
> };
> int ret = 0;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list