[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_plane_alpha_blend: Limit the test execution
Nautiyal, Ankit K
ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com
Wed Feb 8 16:37:09 UTC 2023
On 2/8/2023 8:52 PM, Modem, Bhanuprakash wrote:
> Hi Nidhi,
>
> On Wed-08-02-2023 03:26 pm, Nidhi Gupta wrote:
>> To optimize the test execution time on hardware and simulation,
>> limit the execution to two (first & last) pipes and 2 planes
>> (first & last).
>>
>> This patch will also provide an option (command line flag '-e') to
>> execute on all pipes and planes.
>>
>> Example: ./kms_plane_alpha_blend -e --run-subtest alpha-7efc
>>
>> V2: Edited commit message (Bhanu)
>> V3: New function for simulation constraints (Kamil)
>> Update commit message (Bhanu)
>> v4: Restrict the execution only on 2 pipes for
>> real hardware aswell (Ankit)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nidhi Gupta <nidhi1.gupta at intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/kms_plane_alpha_blend.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/kms_plane_alpha_blend.c
>> b/tests/kms_plane_alpha_blend.c
>> index 38272ccb..03e9c5b5 100644
>> --- a/tests/kms_plane_alpha_blend.c
>> +++ b/tests/kms_plane_alpha_blend.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
>> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test plane alpha and blending mode
>> properties");
>> +static bool extended;
>> +static enum pipe active_pipes[IGT_MAX_PIPES];
>> +static uint32_t last_pipe;
>> +
>> typedef struct {
>> int gfx_fd;
>> igt_display_t display;
>> @@ -482,8 +486,10 @@ static void run_test_on_pipe_planes(data_t
>> *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *
>> {
>> igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
>> igt_plane_t *plane;
>> + int first_plane = -1;
>> + int last_plane = -1;
>> - for_each_plane_on_pipe(display, pipe, plane) {
>> + for_each_plane_on_pipe(&data->display, pipe, plane) {
>
> Why this change? We already have a struct display.
>
>> if (!igt_plane_has_prop(plane, IGT_PLANE_ALPHA))
>> continue;
>> @@ -496,9 +502,30 @@ static void run_test_on_pipe_planes(data_t
>> *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *
>> if (must_multiply && !has_multiplied_alpha(data, plane))
>> continue;
>> - igt_info("Testing plane %u\n", plane->index);
>> - test(data, pipe, plane);
>> - igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
>> + if (first_plane < 0)
>> + first_plane = j__;
>> +
>> + last_plane = j__;
>> +
>> + if (extended) {
>> + igt_info("Testing plane %u\n", plane->index);
>> + test(data, pipe, plane);
>> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!extended) {
>> + for_each_plane_on_pipe(&data->display, pipe, plane) {
>> + if (j__ != first_plane && j__ != last_plane)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + /* reset plane alpha properties between each plane */
>> + reset_alpha(display, pipe);
>> +
>> + igt_info("Testing plane %u\n", plane->index);
>> + test(data, pipe, plane);
>> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
>> + }
>
> There is no issue with this logic, just for readability purpose how
> about below logic?
>
> if (must_multiply && !has_multiplied_alpha(data, plane))
> continue;
>
> + /* Get first & last valid planes. */
> + if (first_plane < 0)
> + first_plane = j__;
> +
> + last_plane = j__;
> + }
> +
> + for_each_plane_on_pipe(display, pipe, plane) {
> + if (!igt_plane_has_prop(plane, IGT_PLANE_ALPHA))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (blend && !igt_plane_has_prop(plane,
> IGT_PLANE_PIXEL_BLEND_MODE))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Reset plane alpha properties between each plane. */
> + reset_alpha(display, pipe);
> +
> + if (must_multiply && !has_multiplied_alpha(data, plane))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!extended && j__ != first_plane && j__ != last_plane)
> + continue;
> +
> igt_info("Testing plane %u\n", plane->index);
> test(data, pipe, plane);
>
> - Bhanu
I agree, this looks more intuitive.
>
>> }
>> igt_output_set_pipe(output, PIPE_NONE);
>> @@ -611,6 +638,16 @@ static bool pipe_check(data_t *data, enum pipe
>> pipe,
>> }
>> }
>> +static bool execution_constraint(enum pipe pipe)
>> +{
>> + if (!extended &&
>> + pipe != active_pipes[0] &&
>> + pipe != active_pipes[last_pipe])
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void run_subtests(data_t *data)
>> {
>> igt_output_t *output;
>> @@ -621,6 +658,8 @@ static void run_subtests(data_t *data)
>> igt_subtest_with_dynamic(subtests[i].name) {
>> for_each_pipe_with_single_output(&data->display, pipe, output) {
>> + if (execution_constraint(pipe))
>> + continue;
>> prepare_crtc(data, output, pipe);
>> if (!pipe_check(data, pipe, subtests[i].blend,
>> subtests[i].must_multiply))
>> continue;
>> @@ -633,15 +672,38 @@ static void run_subtests(data_t *data)
>> }
>> }
>> -igt_main
>> +static int opt_handler(int opt, int opt_index, void *_data)
>> +{
>> + switch (opt) {
>> + case 'e':
>> + extended = true;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return IGT_OPT_HANDLER_ERROR;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return IGT_OPT_HANDLER_SUCCESS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +const char *help_str =
>> + " -e \tExtended tests.\n";
>> +
>> +igt_main_args("e", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>> {
>> data_t data = {};
>> + enum pipe pipe;
This declaration can be moved in the fixture block where it is used.
Regards,
Ankit
>> +
>> + last_pipe = 0;
>> igt_fixture {
>> data.gfx_fd = drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_ANY);
>> igt_require_pipe_crc(data.gfx_fd);
>> igt_display_require(&data.display, data.gfx_fd);
>> igt_require(data.display.is_atomic);
>> + /* Get active pipes. */
>> + for_each_pipe(&data.display, pipe)
>> + active_pipes[last_pipe++] = pipe;
>> + last_pipe--;
>> }
>> run_subtests(&data);
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list