[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/perf_pmu: Compare against requested freq in frequency subtest

[Ashutosh Dixit]

After the i915 commit 95ccf312a1e4f ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allow SLPC to use
efficient frequency"), FW uses the requested freq as the efficient freq
which can exceed the max freq set. Therefore, in the "min freq" part of the
igt at perf_pmu@frequency subtest, compare the requested freq reported by PMU
not against the set freq but against the requested freq reported in sysfs.

Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6806
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
---
 tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
index f363db2ba13..d09eec8f347 100644
--- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ test_interrupts_sync(int gem_fd)
 static void
 test_frequency(int gem_fd)
 {
-	uint32_t min_freq, max_freq, boost_freq;
+	uint32_t min_freq, max_freq, boost_freq, min_req;
 	uint64_t val[2], start[2], slept;
 	double min[2], max[2];
 	igt_spin_t *spin;
@@ -1587,6 +1587,7 @@ test_frequency(int gem_fd)
 
 	min[0] = 1e9*(val[0] - start[0]) / slept;
 	min[1] = 1e9*(val[1] - start[1]) / slept;
+	min_req = igt_sysfs_get_u32(sysfs, "gt_cur_freq_mhz");
 
 	igt_spin_free(gem_fd, spin);
 	gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd); /* Don't leak busy bo into the next phase */
@@ -1633,7 +1634,7 @@ test_frequency(int gem_fd)
 	igt_info("Max frequency: requested %.1f, actual %.1f\n",
 		 max[0], max[1]);
 
-	assert_within_epsilon(min[0], min_freq, tolerance);
+	assert_within_epsilon(min[0], min_req, tolerance);
 	/*
 	 * On thermally throttled devices we cannot be sure maximum frequency
 	 * can be reached so use larger tolerance downards.
-- 
2.38.0