[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 10/16] lib/intel_allocator: Add intel_allocator_bind()
Karolina Stolarek
karolina.stolarek at intel.com
Fri Jul 7 08:01:30 UTC 2023
On 6.07.2023 18:09, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 03:02:29PM +0200, Karolina Stolarek wrote:
>> On 6.07.2023 08:05, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
>>> Synchronize allocator state to vm.
>>>
>>> This change allows xe user to execute vm-bind/unbind for allocator
>>> alloc()/free() operations which occurred since last binding/unbinding.
>>> Before doing exec user should call intel_allocator_bind() to ensure
>>> all vma's are in place.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2: Rewrite tracking mechanism: previous code uses bind map embedded
>>> in allocator structure. Unfortunately this wasn't good idea
>>> - for xe binding everything was fine, but it regress multiprocess/
>>> multithreaded allocations. Main reason of this was children
>>> processes couldn't get its reference as this memory was allocated
>>> on allocator thread (separate process). Currently each child
>>> contains its own separate tracking maps for ahnd and for each
>>> ahnd bind map.
>>> ---
>>> lib/igt_core.c | 5 +
>>> lib/intel_allocator.c | 259 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> lib/intel_allocator.h | 6 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/igt_core.c b/lib/igt_core.c
>>> index 3ee3a01c36..6286e97b1b 100644
>>> --- a/lib/igt_core.c
>>> +++ b/lib/igt_core.c
>>> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
>>> #include "igt_sysrq.h"
>>> #include "igt_rc.h"
>>> #include "igt_list.h"
>>> +#include "igt_map.h"
>>> #include "igt_device_scan.h"
>>> #include "igt_thread.h"
>>> #include "runnercomms.h"
>>> @@ -319,6 +320,8 @@ bool test_multi_fork_child;
>>> /* For allocator purposes */
>>> pid_t child_pid = -1;
>>> __thread pid_t child_tid = -1;
>>> +struct igt_map *ahnd_map;
>>> +pthread_mutex_t ahnd_map_mutex;
>>> enum {
>>> /*
>>> @@ -2509,6 +2512,8 @@ bool __igt_fork(void)
>>> case 0:
>>> test_child = true;
>>> pthread_mutex_init(&print_mutex, NULL);
>>> + pthread_mutex_init(&ahnd_map_mutex, NULL);
>>> + ahnd_map = igt_map_create(igt_map_hash_64, igt_map_equal_64);
>>> child_pid = getpid();
>>> child_tid = -1;
>>> exit_handler_count = 0;
>>> diff --git a/lib/intel_allocator.c b/lib/intel_allocator.c
>>> index 228b33b92f..02d3404abc 100644
>>> --- a/lib/intel_allocator.c
>>> +++ b/lib/intel_allocator.c
>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>> #include "intel_allocator.h"
>>> #include "intel_allocator_msgchannel.h"
>>> #include "xe/xe_query.h"
>>> +#include "xe/xe_util.h"
>>> //#define ALLOCDBG
>>
>> I know it has been here before, but do we want to keep that symbol as a
>> comment?
>>
>
> Ok, I'm touching line above so I'll get rid of this one.
Thanks!
>
>>> #ifdef ALLOCDBG
>>> @@ -46,6 +47,14 @@ static inline const char *reqstr(enum reqtype request_type)
>>> #define alloc_debug(...) {}
>>> #endif
>>> +#ifdef ALLOCBINDDBG
>>> +#define bind_info igt_info
>>> +#define bind_debug igt_debug
>>> +#else
>>> +#define bind_info(...) {}
>>> +#define bind_debug(...) {}
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * We limit allocator space to avoid hang when batch would be
>>> * pinned in the last page.
>>> @@ -65,6 +74,31 @@ struct handle_entry {
>>> struct allocator *al;
>>> };
>>> +/* For tracking alloc()/free() for Xe */
>>
>> Hmm, but it looks like we track it for both drivers, so that comment is
>> slightly confusing. I understand that we build the struct, but don't
>> actually use it with i915. The question is if we want to have it around with
>> i915.
>>
>
> At the moment we enter track_object() function but immediately we find
> ahnd info from the ahnd_map and driver is i915 we return. So alloc() /
> free() are not tracked. I decided to track ahnd because access to map
> and checking out driver field is faster than is_(xe|i915)_device().
> So comment above is correct imo.
Right, by "tracking" I meant calling track_object(), even if it's a
noop. But I'm buying the argument with speed difference, let's leave it
as it is.
>
>>> +struct ahnd_info {
>>> + int fd;
>>> + uint64_t ahnd;
>>> + uint32_t ctx;
>>
>> I'm just thinking, given your 11/16 patch where you update intel_ctx_t
>> struct, could we store it here instead of just an id? Would it be useful to
>> have access to intel_ctx_cfg_t, if one was defined?
>
> I don't want to depend on intel_ctx in intel_allocator. But you're right,
> ctx and vm here are confusing. I'm going to leave only 'vm' field, this
> will enforce distinction between those two drivers. Expect change in v3.
Sounds good, thanks
>
>>
>>> + uint32_t vm;
>>> + enum intel_driver driver;
>>> + struct igt_map *bind_map;
>>> + pthread_mutex_t bind_map_mutex;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +enum allocator_bind_op {
>>> + BOUND,
>>> + TO_BIND,
>>> + TO_UNBIND,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct allocator_object {
>>> + uint32_t handle;
>>> + uint64_t offset;
>>> + uint64_t size;
>>> +
>>> + enum allocator_bind_op bind_op;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> struct intel_allocator *
>>> intel_allocator_reloc_create(int fd, uint64_t start, uint64_t end);
>>> struct intel_allocator *
>>> @@ -123,6 +157,13 @@ static pid_t allocator_pid = -1;
>>> extern pid_t child_pid;
>>> extern __thread pid_t child_tid;
>>> +/*
>>> + * Track alloc()/free() requires storing in local process which has
>>> + * an access to real drm fd it can work on.
>>> + */
>>> +extern struct igt_map *ahnd_map;
>>> +extern pthread_mutex_t ahnd_map_mutex;
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * - for parent process we have child_pid == -1
>>> * - for child which calls intel_allocator_init() allocator_pid == child_pid
>>> @@ -318,7 +359,6 @@ static struct intel_allocator *intel_allocator_create(int fd,
>>> igt_assert(ial);
>>> - ial->driver = get_intel_driver(fd);
>>
>> Please remember to drop that patch so we don't have such diff in v3.
>
> Yes, I've dropped it already.
>
>>
>>> ial->type = allocator_type;
>>> ial->strategy = allocator_strategy;
>>> ial->default_alignment = default_alignment;
>>> @@ -893,6 +933,46 @@ void intel_allocator_multiprocess_stop(void)
>>> }
>>> }
>>> +static void track_ahnd(int fd, uint64_t ahnd, uint32_t ctx, uint32_t vm)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ahnd_info *ainfo;
>>> +
>>> + pthread_mutex_lock(&ahnd_map_mutex);
>>> + ainfo = igt_map_search(ahnd_map, &ahnd);
>>> + if (!ainfo) {
>>> + ainfo = malloc(sizeof(*ainfo));
>>> + ainfo->fd = fd;
>>> + ainfo->ahnd = ahnd;
>>> + ainfo->ctx = ctx;
>>> + ainfo->vm = vm;
>>> + ainfo->driver = get_intel_driver(fd);
>>> + ainfo->bind_map = igt_map_create(igt_map_hash_32, igt_map_equal_32);
>>> + pthread_mutex_init(&ainfo->bind_map_mutex, NULL);
>>> + bind_debug("[TRACK AHND] pid: %d, tid: %d, create <fd: %d, "
>>> + "ahnd: %llx, ctx: %u, vm: %u, driver: %d, ahnd_map: %p, bind_map: %p>\n",
>>> + getpid(), gettid(), ainfo->fd,
>>> + (long long)ainfo->ahnd, ainfo->ctx, ainfo->vm,
>>> + ainfo->driver, ahnd_map, ainfo->bind_map);
>>> + igt_map_insert(ahnd_map, &ainfo->ahnd, ainfo);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&ahnd_map_mutex);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void untrack_ahnd(uint64_t ahnd)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ahnd_info *ainfo;
>>> +
>>> + pthread_mutex_lock(&ahnd_map_mutex);
>>> + ainfo = igt_map_search(ahnd_map, &ahnd);
>>> + if (ainfo) {
>>> + bind_debug("[UNTRACK AHND]: pid: %d, tid: %d, removing ahnd: %llx\n",
>>> + getpid(), gettid(), (long long)ahnd);
>>> + igt_map_remove(ahnd_map, &ahnd, map_entry_free_func);
>>> + }
>>
>> Suggestion: I'd warn on !ainfo, we tried to untrack/free something that
>> wasn't tracked before.
>>
>
> I don't want to warn. In this moment I don't treat closing already closed
> ahnd as reason to warn. See REQ_CLOSE path where it doesn't find allocator.
> It just skips and intel_allocator_close() returns false.
OK, I just checked that if we can't find an allocator, we'll warn about
it. We _could_ warn once again in the untrack function, but that
wouldn't bring too much value.
> I missed adding
> test for this but for example on api_intel_allocator at simple-alloc I may
> add last line:
>
> igt_assert_eq(intel_allocator_close(ahnd), true);
> +igt_assert_eq(intel_allocator_close(ahnd), false);
>
> This will check if allocator was already closed and generate warning
> so cibuglog won't be happy. But maybe I should rethink this and don't
> let invalid ahnd's to be closed? Anyway this requires strict programming
> from the users at all.
I think that we don't need to test for warn, like you said, it would
anger the CI. As for closing an already closed allocator, yeah, that
sounds a bit wrong, but there are no side effects coming from it, so I'd
leave it as it is. I wasn't aware that we already warn in
allocator_close(), hence my previous comment.
>
>>> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&ahnd_map_mutex);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static uint64_t __intel_allocator_open_full(int fd, uint32_t ctx,
>>> uint32_t vm,
>>> uint64_t start, uint64_t end,
>>> @@ -951,6 +1031,8 @@ static uint64_t __intel_allocator_open_full(int fd, uint32_t ctx,
>>> igt_assert(resp.open.allocator_handle);
>>> igt_assert(resp.response_type == RESP_OPEN);
>>> + track_ahnd(fd, resp.open.allocator_handle, ctx, vm);
>>> +
>>> return resp.open.allocator_handle;
>>> }
>>> @@ -1057,6 +1139,8 @@ bool intel_allocator_close(uint64_t allocator_handle)
>>> igt_assert(handle_request(&req, &resp) == 0);
>>> igt_assert(resp.response_type == RESP_CLOSE);
>>> + untrack_ahnd(allocator_handle);
>>> +
>>> return resp.close.is_empty;
>>> }
>>> @@ -1090,6 +1174,76 @@ void intel_allocator_get_address_range(uint64_t allocator_handle,
>>> *endp = resp.address_range.end;
>>> }
>>> +static bool is_same(struct allocator_object *obj,
>>> + uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset, uint64_t size,
>>> + enum allocator_bind_op bind_op)
>>> +{
>>> + return obj->handle == handle && obj->offset == offset && obj->size == size &&
>>> + (obj->bind_op == bind_op || obj->bind_op == BOUND);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void track_object(uint64_t allocator_handle, uint32_t handle,
>>> + uint64_t offset, uint64_t size,
>>> + enum allocator_bind_op bind_op)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ahnd_info *ainfo;
>>> + struct allocator_object *obj;
>>> +
>>> + bind_debug("[TRACK OBJECT]: [%s] pid: %d, tid: %d, ahnd: %llx, handle: %u, offset: %llx, size: %llx\n",
>>> + bind_op == TO_BIND ? "BIND" : "UNBIND",
>>> + getpid(), gettid(),
>>> + (long long)allocator_handle,
>>> + handle, (long long)offset, (long long)size);
>>> +
>>> + if (offset == ALLOC_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
>>> + bind_debug("[TRACK OBJECT] => invalid address %llx, skipping tracking\n",
>>> + (long long)offset);
>>
>> OK, we don't track ALLOC_INVALID_ADDRESS as it means that the allocation in
>> simple_vma_heap_alloc() failed, correct?
>>
>
> Yes, if we cannot fit - first allocation tooks whole space so another one
> will return invalid address.
>
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + pthread_mutex_lock(&ahnd_map_mutex);
>>> + ainfo = igt_map_search(ahnd_map, &allocator_handle);
>>> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&ahnd_map_mutex);
>>> + if (!ainfo) {
>>> + igt_warn("[TRACK OBJECT] => MISSING ahnd %llx <=\n", (long long)allocator_handle);
>>> + igt_assert(ainfo);
>>> + }
>>
>> Could we do igt_assert_f() instead?
>>
>
> Yes, definitely. Left from previous debugging shape.
>
>>> +
>>> + if (ainfo->driver == INTEL_DRIVER_I915)
>>> + return; /* no-op for i915, at least now */
>>
>> I wonder if we could move that tracking to the xe path for now. I mean,
>> maybe there will be some benefit of doing it for i915, but I can't see it,
>> at least for now.
>>
>
> If I don't track ahnd_info (with ahnd as the key) I cannot retrieve driver
> field and I need to run is_i915_device() or is_xe_device() which in my
> opinion consts more than simple access to the map with O(1) complexity.
Right, to reiterate, I'm fine with that approach, you've convinced me :)
>
>>> +
>>> + pthread_mutex_lock(&ainfo->bind_map_mutex);
>>> + obj = igt_map_search(ainfo->bind_map, &handle);
>>> + if (obj) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * User may call alloc() couple of times, check object is the
>>> + * same. For free() there's simple case, just remove from
>>> + * bind_map.
>>> + */
>>> + if (bind_op == TO_BIND)
>>> + igt_assert_eq(is_same(obj, handle, offset, size, bind_op), true);
>>
>> Checkpatch.pl doesn't like the fact that you're not using braces both for if
>> and else if (I have no strong pereference)
>>
>
> Sure, I'll add missing ones to make it happy.
>
>>> + else if (bind_op == TO_UNBIND) {
>>> + if (obj->bind_op == TO_BIND)
>>> + igt_map_remove(ainfo->bind_map, &obj->handle, map_entry_free_func);
>>> + else if (obj->bind_op == BOUND)
>>> + obj->bind_op = bind_op; > + }
>>> + } else {
>>> + /* Ignore to unbind bo which wasn't previously inserted */
>>> + if (bind_op == TO_UNBIND)
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>> + obj = calloc(1, sizeof(*obj));
>>> + obj->handle = handle;
>>> + obj->offset = offset;
>>> + obj->size = size;
>>> + obj->bind_op = bind_op;
>>
>> We don't have to check here for bind_op == BOUND, because the only way to
>> get from to this state is to call __xe_op_bind(), and not alloc/free,
>> correct?
>>
>
> Yes. bind_map which collects active objects allocations/frees works
> on ahnd. I keep those allocations on the map to make this fast.
> Alloc() adds object to map with TO_BIND state, free() with TO_UNBIND
> unless user didn't inject offsets to vm (__xe_op_bind()).
> Collecting objects in xe_object form allows xe_bind_unbind_async()
> to be allocator agostic. The drawback of this is code shape is
> I need to do cleanups in the map (assign BOUND to objects which
> were bound and get rid of unbinded). So I keep allocator_object
> reference in xe_object priv field. Walk over list and finding
> in the map is much quicker. I think I may introduce temporary
> map which will keep xe_object -> allocator_object mapping and
> then I can get rid of 'priv' field.
Thank you for the exhaustive explanation. You can try the temp map, but
maybe as the improvement/refactoring? The priv field itself isn't that
bad, I just asked about adding a comment to it, so the users understand
what it is used for.
Many thanks,
Karolina
>
>>> + igt_map_insert(ainfo->bind_map, &obj->handle, obj);
>>> + }
>>> +out:
>>> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&ainfo->bind_map_mutex);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * __intel_allocator_alloc:
>>> * @allocator_handle: handle to an allocator
>>> @@ -1121,6 +1275,8 @@ uint64_t __intel_allocator_alloc(uint64_t allocator_handle, uint32_t handle,
>>> igt_assert(handle_request(&req, &resp) == 0);
>>> igt_assert(resp.response_type == RESP_ALLOC);
>>> + track_object(allocator_handle, handle, resp.alloc.offset, size, TO_BIND);
>>> +
>>> return resp.alloc.offset;
>>> }
>>> @@ -1198,6 +1354,8 @@ bool intel_allocator_free(uint64_t allocator_handle, uint32_t handle)
>>> igt_assert(handle_request(&req, &resp) == 0);
>>> igt_assert(resp.response_type == RESP_FREE);
>>> + track_object(allocator_handle, handle, 0, 0, TO_UNBIND);
>>> +
>>> return resp.free.freed;
>>> }
>>> @@ -1382,6 +1540,83 @@ void intel_allocator_print(uint64_t allocator_handle)
>>> }
>>> }
>>> +static void __xe_op_bind(struct ahnd_info *ainfo, uint32_t sync_in, uint32_t sync_out)
>>> +{
>>> + struct allocator_object *obj;
>>> + struct igt_map_entry *pos;
>>> + struct igt_list_head obj_list;
>>> + struct xe_object *entry, *tmp;
>>> +
>>> + IGT_INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj_list);
>>> +
>>> + pthread_mutex_lock(&ainfo->bind_map_mutex);
>>> + igt_map_foreach(ainfo->bind_map, pos) {
>>> + obj = pos->data;
>>> +
>>> + if (obj->bind_op == BOUND)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + bind_info("= [vm: %u] %s => %u %lx %lx\n",
>>> + ainfo->ctx,
>>> + obj->bind_op == TO_BIND ? "TO BIND" : "TO UNBIND",
>>> + obj->handle, obj->offset,
>>> + obj->size);
>>> +
>>> + entry = malloc(sizeof(*entry));
>>> + entry->handle = obj->handle;
>>> + entry->offset = obj->offset;
>>> + entry->size = obj->size;
>>> + entry->bind_op = obj->bind_op == TO_BIND ? XE_OBJECT_BIND :
>>> + XE_OBJECT_UNBIND;
>>> + entry->priv = obj;
>>> + igt_list_add(&entry->link, &obj_list);
>>> + }
>>> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&ainfo->bind_map_mutex);
>>> +
>>> + xe_bind_unbind_async(ainfo->fd, ainfo->ctx, 0, &obj_list, sync_in, sync_out);
>>
>> Shouldn't the second param be ainfo->vm, not ainfo->ctx?
>>
>
> Yes, mixing i915 ctx as vm reference is confusing. I'm going to remove
> that unlucky ctx field there.
>
>>> +
>>> + pthread_mutex_lock(&ainfo->bind_map_mutex);
>>> + igt_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &obj_list, link) {
>>> + obj = entry->priv;
>>> + if (obj->bind_op == TO_BIND)
>>> + obj->bind_op = BOUND;
>>> + else
>>> + igt_map_remove(ainfo->bind_map, &obj->handle, map_entry_free_func);
>>> +
>>> + igt_list_del(&entry->link);
>>> + free(entry);
>>> + }
>>> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&ainfo->bind_map_mutex);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * intel_allocator_bind:
>>> + * @allocator_handle: handle to an allocator
>>> + * @sync_in: syncobj (fence-in)
>>> + * @sync_out: syncobj (fence-out)
>>> + *
>>> + * Function binds and unbinds all objects added to the allocator which weren't
>>> + * previously binded/unbinded.
>>> + *
>>> + **/
>>> +void intel_allocator_bind(uint64_t allocator_handle,
>>> + uint32_t sync_in, uint32_t sync_out)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ahnd_info *ainfo;
>>> +
>>> + pthread_mutex_lock(&ahnd_map_mutex);
>>> + ainfo = igt_map_search(ahnd_map, &allocator_handle);
>>> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&ahnd_map_mutex);
>>> + igt_assert(ainfo);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * We collect bind/unbind operations on alloc()/free() to do group
>>> + * operation getting @sync_in as syncobj handle (fence-in). If user
>>> + * passes 0 as @sync_out we bind/unbind synchronously.
>>> + */
>>> + __xe_op_bind(ainfo, sync_in, sync_out);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int equal_handles(const void *key1, const void *key2)
>>> {
>>> const struct handle_entry *h1 = key1, *h2 = key2;
>>> @@ -1439,6 +1674,23 @@ static void __free_maps(struct igt_map *map, bool close_allocators)
>>> igt_map_destroy(map, map_entry_free_func);
>>> }
>>> +static void __free_ahnd_map(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct igt_map_entry *pos;
>>> + struct ahnd_info *ainfo;
>>> +
>>> + if (!ahnd_map)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + igt_map_foreach(ahnd_map, pos) {
>>> + ainfo = pos->data;
>>> + igt_map_destroy(ainfo->bind_map, map_entry_free_func);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + igt_map_destroy(ahnd_map, map_entry_free_func);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>
>> ^- Whoops, an extra blank line
>>
>
> Deleted in v3.
>
>>> /**
>>> * intel_allocator_init:
>>> *
>>> @@ -1456,12 +1708,15 @@ void intel_allocator_init(void)
>>> __free_maps(handles, true);
>>> __free_maps(ctx_map, false);
>>> __free_maps(vm_map, false);
>>> + __free_ahnd_map();
>>> atomic_init(&next_handle, 1);
>>> handles = igt_map_create(hash_handles, equal_handles);
>>> ctx_map = igt_map_create(hash_instance, equal_ctx);
>>> vm_map = igt_map_create(hash_instance, equal_vm);
>>> - igt_assert(handles && ctx_map && vm_map);
>>> + pthread_mutex_init(&ahnd_map_mutex, NULL);
>>> + ahnd_map = igt_map_create(igt_map_hash_64, igt_map_equal_64);
>>> + igt_assert(handles && ctx_map && vm_map && ahnd_map); >
>>> channel = intel_allocator_get_msgchannel(CHANNEL_SYSVIPC_MSGQUEUE);
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/lib/intel_allocator.h b/lib/intel_allocator.h
>>> index 1001b21b98..f9ff7f1cc9 100644
>>> --- a/lib/intel_allocator.h
>>> +++ b/lib/intel_allocator.h
>>> @@ -141,9 +141,6 @@ struct intel_allocator {
>>> /* allocator's private structure */
>>> void *priv;
>>> - /* driver - i915 or Xe */
>>> - enum intel_driver driver;
>>> -
>>
>> OK, I see it now. Please drop 9/16 and use per-thread driver info then.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Karolina
>
> Thank you for the time and review comments.
>
> --
> Zbigniew
>
>>
>>> void (*get_address_range)(struct intel_allocator *ial,
>>> uint64_t *startp, uint64_t *endp);
>>> uint64_t (*alloc)(struct intel_allocator *ial, uint32_t handle,
>>> @@ -213,6 +210,9 @@ bool intel_allocator_reserve_if_not_allocated(uint64_t allocator_handle,
>>> void intel_allocator_print(uint64_t allocator_handle);
>>> +void intel_allocator_bind(uint64_t allocator_handle,
>>> + uint32_t sync_in, uint32_t sync_out);
>>> +
>>> #define ALLOC_INVALID_ADDRESS (-1ull)
>>> #define INTEL_ALLOCATOR_NONE 0
>>> #define INTEL_ALLOCATOR_RELOC 1
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list