[igt-dev] [PATCH 4/5] xe_vm: Unmap BOs in bind queue independent test
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Jul 13 15:32:53 UTC 2023
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Exercises the maple tree dep tracker logic.
could you please add a bit more of explanation here on how this
is achieving the objective?
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/xe/xe_vm.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xe/xe_vm.c b/tests/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 5fd511f0b..36cd80357 100644
> --- a/tests/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/tests/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -811,6 +811,12 @@ test_bind_engines_independent(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci)
> NULL));
> igt_assert_eq(data[0].data, 0xc0ffee);
>
> + syncobj_destroy(fd, sync[0].handle);
> + sync[0].handle = syncobj_create(fd, 0);
> + sync[0].flags |= DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL;
> + xe_vm_unbind_all_async(fd, vm, 0, bo, sync, 1);
> + igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &sync[0].handle, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, NULL));
should we have an extra flag for this? no risk to the existent tests?
> +
> syncobj_destroy(fd, sync[0].handle);
> for (i = 0; i < N_ENGINES; i++) {
> syncobj_destroy(fd, syncobjs[i]);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list