[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 3/3] test/xe_pm: Add vram_d3cold_threshold subtest
Gupta, Anshuman
anshuman.gupta at intel.com
Fri Jul 21 07:22:28 UTC 2023
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 2:38 AM
> To: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
> Cc: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org; Dixit, Ashutosh
> <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>; Nilawar, Badal <badal.nilawar at intel.com>;
> Tauro, Riana <riana.tauro at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v3 3/3] test/xe_pm: Add vram_d3cold_threshold
> subtest
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 04:38:52PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> > Adding a vram_d3cold_threshold subtest, which creates a Xe bo and set
> > the vram_d3cold_threshold according to vram used and bo size.
> > Test setups the d3cold and expect card to be limited to d3hot.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Add subtest doc.
> > v3:
> > - skip the test on igfx. [Riana]
> > - Test doc enhancement. [Riana]
> > - Create the bo before vram query. [Riana]
> > - Use xe_bo_map insead of xe_bo_mmap_offset and mmap. [Riana]
> > - Close the bo handle. [Riana]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/xe/xe_pm.c | 82
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/xe/xe_pm.c b/tests/xe/xe_pm.c index
> > 11a4c3705..a8257b13c 100644
> > --- a/tests/xe/xe_pm.c
> > +++ b/tests/xe/xe_pm.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > #include "lib/igt_device.h"
> > #include "lib/igt_kms.h"
> > #include "lib/igt_pm.h"
> > +#include "lib/igt_sysfs.h"
> > #include "lib/igt_syncobj.h"
> > #include "lib/intel_reg.h"
> >
> > @@ -31,6 +32,8 @@
> > #define NO_SUSPEND -1
> > #define NO_RPM -1
> >
> > +#define SIZE (4096 * 1024)
> > +
> > typedef struct {
> > int fd_xe;
> > struct pci_device *pci_xe;
> > @@ -77,6 +80,22 @@ static void set_d3cold_allowed(struct pci_device
> *pci,
> > close(fd);
> > }
> >
> > +static void set_vram_d3cold_threshold(int sysfs, uint64_t threshold)
> > +{
> > + char path[64];
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + sprintf(path, "device/vram_d3cold_threshold");
> > +
> > + if (!faccessat(sysfs, path, R_OK | W_OK, 0))
> > + ret = igt_sysfs_printf(sysfs, path, "%lu", threshold);
> > + else
> > + igt_warn("vram_d3cold_threshold is not present\n");
> > +
> > + igt_info("ret value %d", ret);
> > + igt_assert(ret > 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool setup_d3(device_t device, enum igt_acpi_d_state state) {
> > igt_dpms_turn_off_display(device.fd_xe);
> > @@ -349,6 +368,64 @@ NULL));
> > igt_assert(in_d3(device, d_state)); }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * SUBTEST: vram-d3cold-threshold
> > + * Description:
> > + * Validate whether card is limited to d3hot while vram used
> > + * is greater than vram_d3cold_threshold.
> > + * Run type: FULL
> > + */
> > +static void test_vram_d3cold_threshold(device_t device) {
> > + struct drm_xe_query_mem_usage *mem_usage;
> > + struct drm_xe_device_query query = {
> > + .extensions = 0,
> > + .query = DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_MEM_USAGE,
> > + .size = 0,
> > + .data = 0,
> > + };
> > + uint64_t vram_used_mb = 0, vram_total_mb = 0, threshold;
> > + uint32_t bo, flags;
> > + void *map;
> > + int i, sysfs_fd;
> > +
> > + flags = vram_memory(device.fd_xe, 0);
> > + igt_require_f(flags, "Device doesn't support vram memory
> region\n");
> > +
> > + igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl(device.fd_xe,
> DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY, &query), 0);
> > + igt_assert_neq(query.size, 0);
> > +
> > + mem_usage = malloc(query.size);
> > + igt_assert(mem_usage);
> > +
> > + query.data = to_user_pointer(mem_usage);
> > + igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl(device.fd_xe,
> DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY,
> > +&query), 0);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < mem_usage->num_regions; i++) {
> > + if (mem_usage->regions[i].mem_class ==
> XE_MEM_REGION_CLASS_VRAM) {
> > + vram_used_mb += (mem_usage->regions[i].used /
> (1024 * 1024));
> > + vram_total_mb += (mem_usage-
> >regions[i].total_size / (1024 * 1024));
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + threshold = vram_used_mb;
> > + igt_require(threshold < vram_total_mb);
> > +
> > + bo = xe_bo_create_flags(device.fd_xe, 0, SIZE, flags);
> > + map = xe_bo_map(device.fd_xe, bo, SIZE);
> > + memset(map, 0, SIZE);
> > + munmap(map, SIZE);
> > + sysfs_fd = igt_sysfs_open(device.fd_xe);
> > + set_vram_d3cold_threshold(sysfs_fd, threshold);
> > + close(sysfs_fd);
> > +
> > + /* Setup D3Cold but card should be in D3hot */
> > + igt_assert(setup_d3(device, IGT_ACPI_D3Cold));
>
> should we add some wait here to ensure we gave the proper time for
> everything to settle?
>
> > + igt_assert(in_d3(device, IGT_ACPI_D3Hot));
> > + igt_assert(out_of_d3(device, IGT_ACPI_D3Cold));
> > + gem_close(device.fd_xe, bo);
> > +}
> > +
> > igt_main
> > {
> > struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe; @@ -449,6 +526,11 @@
> > igt_main
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + igt_describe("Validate whether card is limited to d3hot, if vram used
> > vram threshold");
> > + igt_subtest("vram-d3cold-threshold") {
> > + test_vram_d3cold_threshold(device);
> > + }
>
> we probably need the other test and confirming that we are really getting
> d3cold after touching this sysfs entry.
>
> With the kernel series I just sent that should work.
Shall we improvise this test to test d3cold again after freeing the xe bo ?
Thanks,
Anshuman.
>
> but let's start with this:
>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>
> > +
> > igt_fixture {
> > set_d3cold_allowed(device.pci_xe, d3cold_allowed);
> > igt_restore_runtime_pm();
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list