[igt-dev] [PATCH 4/5] xe_vm: Unmap BOs in bind queue independent test

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 09:37:34PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Unmaps also exercise the bind conflict logic in Xe, add an unmap to the
> bind queue independent test to further test the conflict logic.
> 
> v2: new commit message (Rodrigo)

Thanks for this and for the extra explanation offline.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/xe/xe_vm.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xe/xe_vm.c b/tests/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 5fd511f0b8..36cd803577 100644
> --- a/tests/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/tests/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -811,6 +811,12 @@ test_bind_engines_independent(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci)
>  				NULL));
>  	igt_assert_eq(data[0].data, 0xc0ffee);
>  
> +	syncobj_destroy(fd, sync[0].handle);
> +	sync[0].handle = syncobj_create(fd, 0);
> +	sync[0].flags |= DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL;
> +	xe_vm_unbind_all_async(fd, vm, 0, bo, sync, 1);
> +	igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &sync[0].handle, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, NULL));

it looks like this would work even without the conflict logic, but yeap,
it will exercise that piece of tree, and it doesn't hurt. So, let's move
with it:

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>


> +
>  	syncobj_destroy(fd, sync[0].handle);
>  	for (i = 0; i < N_ENGINES; i++) {
>  		syncobj_destroy(fd, syncobjs[i]);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>