[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/xe/xe_spin: Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe.
Kumar, Janga Rahul
janga.rahul.kumar at intel.com
Thu Jun 1 07:59:49 UTC 2023
> -----Original Message-----
> From: igt-dev <igt-dev-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Kamil
> Konieczny
> Sent: 01 June 2023 10:42
> To: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Ch, Sai Gowtham <sai.gowtham.ch at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/xe/xe_spin: Integrate
> igt_spin_new with Xe.
>
> Hi Sai,
>
> On 2023-05-30 at 15:38:04 +0530, sai.gowtham.ch at intel.com wrote:
> > From: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch at intel.com>
> >
>
> please remove dot from end of Subject line:
>
> [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/xe/xe_spin: Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe.
> --------------------------------------------------------------- ^
>
> so it will be:
>
> [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/xe/xe_spin: Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe
>
> The same follows for your second patch. I have few more nits, see below.
>
> > Extending the spin_create implementation and allocator handle support
> > in xe, where it submits dummy work loads to engine. This
> > Implementation is wrapped around vm_bind and unbind as we are
> supposed to do it manually for xe.
> >
> > Cc: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch at intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/igt_dummyload.c | 24 +++++++++--- lib/igt_dummyload.h | 10 +++++
> > lib/xe/xe_spin.c | 91
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/xe/xe_spin.h | 7 ++++
> > 4 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_dummyload.c b/lib/igt_dummyload.c index
> > 740a58f3..6e89b72d 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_dummyload.c
> > +++ b/lib/igt_dummyload.c
> > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
> > #include "intel_reg.h"
> > #include "ioctl_wrappers.h"
> > #include "sw_sync.h"
> > +#include "xe/xe_spin.h"
> >
> > /**
> > * SECTION:igt_dummyload
> > @@ -447,7 +448,10 @@ spin_create(int fd, const struct igt_spin_factory
> > *opts) igt_spin_t * __igt_spin_factory(int fd, const struct
> > igt_spin_factory *opts) {
> > - return spin_create(fd, opts);
> > + if (is_xe_device(fd))
> > + return xe_spin_create(fd, opts);
> > + else
> > + return spin_create(fd, opts);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -467,6 +471,11 @@ igt_spin_factory(int fd, const struct
> > igt_spin_factory *opts) {
> > igt_spin_t *spin;
> >
> > + if (is_xe_device(fd)) {
> > + spin = xe_spin_create(fd, opts);
> > + return spin;
> > + }
> > +
> > if ((opts->flags & IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN) && opts->engine !=
> ALL_ENGINES) {
> > unsigned int class;
> >
> > @@ -647,11 +656,14 @@ void igt_spin_free(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin)
> > if (!spin)
> > return;
> >
> > - pthread_mutex_lock(&list_lock);
> > - igt_list_del(&spin->link);
> > - pthread_mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> > -
> > - __igt_spin_free(fd, spin);
> > + if (is_xe_device(fd)) {
> > + xe_spin_free(fd, spin);
> > + } else {
> > + pthread_mutex_lock(&list_lock);
> > + igt_list_del(&spin->link);
> > + pthread_mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> > + __igt_spin_free(fd, spin);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > void igt_terminate_spins(void)
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_dummyload.h b/lib/igt_dummyload.h index
> > b247ab02..7bcc7b56 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_dummyload.h
> > +++ b/lib/igt_dummyload.h
> > @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ typedef struct igt_spin_factory {
> > unsigned int flags;
> > int fence;
> > uint64_t ahnd;
> > + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> > + uint32_t vm;
Add description of newly added variables
> > } igt_spin_factory_t;
> >
> > typedef struct igt_spin {
> > @@ -83,6 +85,14 @@ typedef struct igt_spin { #define SPIN_CLFLUSH (1
> > << 0)
> >
> > struct igt_spin_factory opts;
> > +
> > + struct xe_spin *xe_spin;
> > + size_t bo_size;
> > + uint64_t address;
> > + unsigned int engine;
> > + uint32_t vm;
vm defined inside spin_factory as well, can we avoid this if it is redundant
Thanks,
Rahul
> > + uint32_t syncobj;
> > +
> > } igt_spin_t;
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_spin.c b/lib/xe/xe_spin.c index
> > 856d0ba2..bc0fbcc6 100644
> > --- a/lib/xe/xe_spin.c
> > +++ b/lib/xe/xe_spin.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> > #include "intel_reg.h"
> > #include "xe_ioctl.h"
> > #include "xe_spin.h"
> > +#include "lib/igt_dummyload.h"
> ------------ ^
> Do we need "lib/" here ? Please also put this in alphabetical order.
>
> >
> > /**
> > * xe_spin_init:
> > @@ -82,6 +83,96 @@ void xe_spin_end(struct xe_spin *spin)
> > spin->end = 0;
> > }
> >
>
> Please describe each new public function you added.
>
> > +igt_spin_t *
> > +xe_spin_create(int fd, const struct igt_spin_factory *opt) {
> > + size_t bo_size = xe_get_default_alignment(fd);
> > + uint32_t bo;
> > + uint64_t ahnd = opt->ahnd, addr;
> > + struct igt_spin *spin;
> > + struct xe_spin *xe_spin;
> > + struct drm_xe_sync sync = {
> > + .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_SYNCOBJ | DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL,
> > + };
> > + struct drm_xe_exec exec = {
> > + .num_batch_buffer = 1,
> > + .num_syncs = 1,
> > + .syncs = to_user_pointer(&sync),
> > + };
> > +
> > + igt_assert(ahnd);
> > + spin = calloc(1, sizeof(struct igt_spin));
> > + igt_assert(spin);
> > +
> > + spin->syncobj = syncobj_create(fd, 0);
> > + if (opt->engine) {
> > + spin->opts.engine = opt->engine;
> > + spin->opts.vm = opt->vm;
> > +
> > + spin->handle = xe_bo_create(fd, 0, spin->opts.vm, bo_size);
> > + xe_spin = xe_bo_map(fd, spin->handle, bo_size);
> > + addr = intel_allocator_alloc_with_strategy(ahnd, spin-
> >handle, bo_size, 0, ALLOC_STRATEGY_LOW_TO_HIGH);
> > + xe_vm_bind_sync(fd, spin->opts.vm, spin->handle, 0, addr,
> bo_size);
> > +
> > + xe_spin_init(xe_spin, addr, true);
> > + exec.engine_id = spin->opts.engine;
> > + exec.address = addr;
> > + } else {
> > + spin->vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
> > + if (!opt->hwe)
> > + spin->engine = xe_engine_create_class(fd, spin-
> >vm, DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER);
> > + else
> > + spin->engine = xe_engine_create(fd, spin->vm, opt-
> >hwe, 0);
> > +
> > + bo = xe_bo_create(fd, 0, spin->vm, bo_size);
> > + spin->handle = bo;
> > + xe_spin = xe_bo_map(fd, spin->handle, bo_size);
> > + addr = intel_allocator_alloc_with_strategy(ahnd, spin-
> >handle, bo_size, 0, ALLOC_STRATEGY_LOW_TO_HIGH);
> > + xe_vm_bind_sync(fd, spin->vm, spin->handle, 0, addr,
> bo_size);
> > +
> > + xe_spin_init(xe_spin, addr, true);
> > + exec.engine_id = spin->engine;
> > + exec.address = addr;
> > + }
>
> Put newline here.
>
> > + sync.handle = spin->syncobj;
> > + igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC, &exec), 0);
> > + xe_spin_wait_started(xe_spin);
> > + igt_info("Spinner started\n");
> > +
> > + spin->bo_size = bo_size;
> > + spin->address = addr;
> > + spin->xe_spin = xe_spin;
> > +
> > + return spin;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Write description.
>
> > +void xe_spin_sync_wait(int fd, struct igt_spin *spin) {
> > + igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &spin->syncobj, 1, INT64_MAX, 0,
> > + NULL));
>
> imho you can have it in one line:
>
> igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &spin->syncobj, 1, INT64_MAX, 0,
> NULL));
>
> > +}
> > +
>
> Write description.
>
> > +void xe_spin_free(int fd, struct igt_spin *spin) {
> > + xe_spin_end(spin->xe_spin);
> > + xe_spin_sync_wait(fd, spin);
> > +
> > + if (!spin->opts.vm)
> > + xe_vm_unbind_sync(fd, spin->vm, 0, spin->address, spin-
> >bo_size);
> > + else
> > + xe_vm_unbind_sync(fd, spin->opts.vm, 0, spin->address,
> > +spin->bo_size);
> > +
> > + syncobj_destroy(fd, spin->syncobj);
> > + gem_munmap(spin->xe_spin, spin->bo_size);
> > + gem_close(fd, spin->handle);
> > +
> > + if (!spin->opts.engine) {
> > + xe_engine_destroy(fd, spin->engine);
> > + xe_vm_destroy(fd, spin->vm);
> > + }
>
> Put newline here.
>
> > + free(spin);
> > +}
> > +
> > void xe_cork_init(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe,
> > struct xe_cork *cork)
> > {
> > diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_spin.h b/lib/xe/xe_spin.h index
> > 73f9a026..48867eb8 100644
> > --- a/lib/xe/xe_spin.h
> > +++ b/lib/xe/xe_spin.h
> > @@ -13,19 +13,26 @@
> > #include <stdbool.h>
> >
> > #include "xe_query.h"
> > +#include "lib/igt_dummyload.h"
> >
> > /* Mapped GPU object */
> > +
>
> Please do not make cleanups when adding new functionality, remove this
> newline.
>
> > struct xe_spin {
> > uint32_t batch[16];
> > uint64_t pad;
> > uint32_t start;
> > uint32_t end;
> > +
>
> Same here, remove this line.
>
> > };
> >
> > +igt_spin_t *
> -- ^
> > +xe_spin_create(int fd, const struct igt_spin_factory *opt);
> -- ^
>
> imho here one-liner is better:
>
> igt_spin_t *xe_spin_create(int fd, const struct igt_spin_factory *opt);
>
> Regards,
> Kamil
>
> > void xe_spin_init(struct xe_spin *spin, uint64_t addr, bool preempt);
> > bool xe_spin_started(struct xe_spin *spin);
> > +void xe_spin_sync_wait(int fd, struct igt_spin *spin);
> > void xe_spin_wait_started(struct xe_spin *spin); void
> > xe_spin_end(struct xe_spin *spin);
> > +void xe_spin_free(int fd, struct igt_spin *spin);
> >
> > struct xe_cork {
> > struct xe_spin *spin;
> > --
> > 2.39.1
> >
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list