[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_plane_cursor: Pipe-D is invalid in big joiner
Modem, Bhanuprakash
bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com
Wed Jun 14 14:19:41 UTC 2023
Hi Nidhi,
On Wed-14-06-2023 05:22 pm, Nidhi Gupta wrote:
> Pipe D is invalid in big joiner and because of that currently
> test throws as skip for all the pipes and as it is within the
> dynamic subtest block.
> Fixed in IGT to skip the big joiner validity check for pipe-D
> and execute for the rest of the pipes as it is.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nidhi Gupta <nidhi1.gupta at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_plane_cursor.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_plane_cursor.c b/tests/kms_plane_cursor.c
> index 59b105c6..38918bb7 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_plane_cursor.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_plane_cursor.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,10 @@ static void test_init(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe_id, igt_output_t *output)
> data->cursor = igt_pipe_get_plane_type(data->pipe, DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR);
>
> igt_output_set_pipe(data->output, data->pipe_id);
> - igt_require(i915_pipe_output_combo_valid(display));
> +
> + /*Pipe D is invalid in big joiner*/
> + if (data->pipe_id != PIPE_D)
> + igt_require(i915_pipe_output_combo_valid(display));
Why do we need to call this helper for pipe-A/B/C as we already know
these pipes can support bigjoiner? If upcoming hardware enables pip-E/F,
then how this logic can handle?
i915_pipe_output_combo_valid() itself is taken care of last pipe (pipe-D
in case of adl/dg2). Maybe you need to think about a way to check before
calling the igt_dynamic().
- Bhanu
>
> igt_info("Using (pipe %s + %s) to run the subtest.\n",
> kmstest_pipe_name(data->pipe_id), igt_output_name(data->output));
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list