[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_setmode: Fix dynamic subtests
Kamil Konieczny
kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Thu Jun 22 12:55:34 UTC 2023
Hi Jeevan,
On 2023-06-22 at 16:46:51 +0530, Jeevan B wrote:
> basic-clone-single-crtc and invalid-clone-exclusive-crtc were not
> part of dynamic subtest so tests were getting skipped. fixed the
> test to execute skipping tests as expected.
>
> v2: add missing call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_setmode.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_setmode.c b/tests/kms_setmode.c
> index a611d938..96fb0b4b 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_setmode.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_setmode.c
> @@ -647,20 +647,19 @@ static void test_one_combination(const struct test_config *tconf,
> struct crtc_config crtcs[MAX_CRTCS];
> int crtc_count;
> bool config_valid;
> + int i, pos = 0;
> + char test_name[256];
>
> setup_crtcs(tconf, cconfs, connector_count, crtcs,
> &crtc_count, &config_valid);
>
> - if (config_valid == !(tconf->flags & TEST_INVALID)) {
> - int i, pos = 0;
> - char test_name[256];
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < crtc_count; i++) {
> - if (i > 0)
> - pos += snprintf(&test_name[pos], ARRAY_SIZE(test_name) - pos, "-");
> - pos += get_test_name_str(&crtcs[i], &test_name[pos], ARRAY_SIZE(test_name) - pos);
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < crtc_count; i++) {
> + if (i > 0)
> + pos += snprintf(&test_name[pos], ARRAY_SIZE(test_name) - pos, "-");
> + pos += get_test_name_str(&crtcs[i], &test_name[pos], ARRAY_SIZE(test_name) - pos);
> + }
>
> + if (config_valid == !(tconf->flags & TEST_INVALID)) {
> for (i = 0; i < crtc_count; i++) {
> struct crtc_config *crtc = &crtcs[i];
>
> @@ -679,16 +678,17 @@ static void test_one_combination(const struct test_config *tconf,
> ((i > 0) && (crtc[i - 1].mode.hdisplay > MAX_HDISPLAY_PER_CRTC) &&
> (abs(crtc->crtc_idx - crtcs[i - 1].crtc_idx) <= 1))) {
> igt_info("Combo: %s is not possible with selected mode(s).\n", test_name);
> - goto out;
> + cleanup_crtcs(crtcs, crtc_count);
> + return;
> }
> }
>
> igt_dynamic_f("%s", test_name)
> test_crtc_config(tconf, crtcs, crtc_count);
> + } else {
> + igt_dynamic_f("%s", test_name)
> + cleanup_crtcs(crtcs, crtc_count);
----------------------- ^
The name of function and its placement just before function end
suggest it is a cleanup, not a test.
I would advise going with git log and finding when these two
tests where executed with "normal", non-dynamic way and then
adjusting this function, or adding them as separate subtests
with proper configuration.
> }
> -
> -out:
> - cleanup_crtcs(crtcs, crtc_count);
Drop this change, looks dangereous.
Regards,
Kamil
> }
>
> static int assign_crtc_to_connectors(const struct test_config *tconf,
> --
> 2.41.0
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list