[igt-dev] [PATCH 1/2] amdgpu/amd_plane: Add multi MPO XRGB8888 test
Leo Li
sunpeng.li at amd.com
Wed Mar 15 20:30:47 UTC 2023
On 3/13/23 12:32, Bhawanpreet Lakha wrote:
> [Why]
> Some of our ASICs support multiple overlay planes, so create
> a test to test them
>
> [How]
> Create a plane with two holes and fill them up with 2 overlay planes
>
> *v2
> create a overlap/non overlap test instead of using rand()
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha at amd.com>
> ---
> tests/amdgpu/amd_plane.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/amd_plane.c b/tests/amdgpu/amd_plane.c
> index b9eec677..3e8b1f31 100644
> --- a/tests/amdgpu/amd_plane.c
> +++ b/tests/amdgpu/amd_plane.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ typedef struct data {
> igt_plane_t *primary[MAX_PIPES];
> igt_plane_t *cursor[MAX_PIPES];
> igt_plane_t *overlay[MAX_PIPES];
> + igt_plane_t *overlay2[MAX_PIPES];
> igt_output_t *output[MAX_PIPES];
> igt_pipe_t *pipe[MAX_PIPES];
> igt_pipe_crc_t *pipe_crc[MAX_PIPES];
> @@ -144,7 +145,8 @@ static void lut_free(lut_t *lut)
> enum test {
> MPO_SINGLE_PAN,
> MPO_MULTI_PAN,
> - MPO_SCALE
> + MPO_SCALE,
> + MPO_MULTI_OVERLAY
> };
>
> static void test_init(data_t *data)
> @@ -159,6 +161,8 @@ static void test_init(data_t *data)
> data->pipe[i], DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY);
> data->overlay[i] = igt_pipe_get_plane_type_index(
> data->pipe[i], DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY, 0);
> + data->overlay2[i] = igt_pipe_get_plane_type_index(
> + data->pipe[i], DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY, 1);
> data->cursor[i] = igt_pipe_get_plane_type(
> data->pipe[i], DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR);
> data->pipe_crc[i] =
> @@ -252,6 +256,7 @@ struct fbc {
> igt_fb_t ref_primary;
> igt_fb_t test_primary;
> igt_fb_t test_overlay;
> + igt_fb_t test_overlay2;
> igt_crc_t ref_crc;
> };
>
> @@ -264,6 +269,105 @@ static void set_regamma_lut(data_t *data, lut_t const *lut, int n)
> size);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Compares the result of white backgroud with white window with and without MPO
> + *
> + * Reference crc:
> + * Draws a White background of size (pw,ph).
> + *
> + * Test crc:
> + * Draws a White Overlay of size (pw,ph) then creates a cutout of size (w,h) at location (x1, y1) and (x2, y2)
> + * Draws a White Primary plane of size (w, h) at location (x1,y1) (under the overlay)
> + * Draws a White Overlay of size (w, h) at location (x2,y2)
> + *
> + * NOTE: The reason for using White+White is to speed up the crc (reuse the ref crc for all cases vs taking
> + * a ref crc per flip)
> + */
> +static void test_plane2(data_t *data, int n, int x1, int y1, int x2, int y2, int w, int h, int pw, int ph, struct fbc *fbc){
> +
> + igt_crc_t test_crc;
> + igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
> +
> + /* Reference: */
> +
> + igt_plane_set_fb(data->primary[n], &fbc[n].ref_primary);
> +
> + igt_plane_set_position(data->primary[n], 0, 0);
> + igt_plane_set_size(data->primary[n], pw, ph);
> +
> + igt_display_commit_atomic(display, 0, 0);
> +
> + /* Test: */
> + /* Draw a white overlay with two cutouts at (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) */
> + draw_color_alpha(&fbc[n].test_overlay2, 0, 0, pw, ph, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0);
> + draw_color_alpha(&fbc[n].test_overlay2, x1, y1, w, h, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
> + draw_color_alpha(&fbc[n].test_overlay2, x2, y2, w, h, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
> +
> + /* Draw a overlay to cover up one hole */
> + draw_color_alpha(&fbc[n].test_overlay, 0, 0, pw, ph, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
> + draw_color_alpha(&fbc[n].test_overlay, x2, y2, w, h, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0);
> +
> + /* Draw a primary to cover up the other hole */
> + draw_color_alpha(&fbc[n].test_primary, 0, 0, w, h, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
> + draw_color_alpha(&fbc[n].test_primary, 0, 0, w, h, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0);
> +
> + igt_plane_set_fb(data->primary[n], &fbc[n].test_primary);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(data->overlay[n], &fbc[n].test_overlay);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(data->overlay2[n], &fbc[n].test_overlay2);
> +
> + /* Move the primary to cover one of the holes*/
> + igt_plane_set_position(data->primary[n], x1, y1);
> + igt_plane_set_size(data->primary[n], w, h);
Hi Bhawan,
For the primary plane, it looks like we're drawing at (0,0), then moving
to (x1, y1). For the overlay plane, we're drawing directly at (x2, y2)
without moving the plane. Is that on purpose?
> +
> +
> + igt_display_commit_atomic(display, 0, 0);
> + igt_pipe_crc_collect_crc(data->pipe_crc[n], &test_crc);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(data->overlay[n], NULL);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(data->overlay2[n], NULL);
> +
> + igt_assert_crc_equal(&fbc[n].ref_crc, &test_crc);
> +
> + /* Set window to white, this is to avoid flashing between black/white after each flip */
> + draw_color_alpha(&fbc[n].ref_primary, 0, 0, w, h, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.00);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(data->primary[n], &fbc[n].ref_primary);
> + igt_plane_set_position(data->primary[n], 0, 0);
> + igt_plane_set_size(data->primary[n], pw, ph);
> + igt_display_commit_atomic(display, 0, 0);
> +
> +
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * MPO_MULTI_OVERLAY: This test takes the plane sizes and assigns random position within the screen
Drop "random"
> + *
> + * The test creates a white screen with 2 cutouts which are to be filled with 2 overlay planes.
> + * Testing multiple overlay planes
> + */
> +static void test_multi_overlay(data_t *data, int display_count, int w, int h, struct fbc *fb)
> +{
> +
> + for (int n = 0; n < display_count; n++) {
> +
> + int pw = data->w[n];
> + int ph = data->h[n];
> +
> + if (pw <= w && ph <= h)
> + break;
> +
> + /* Don't overlap the planes */
> + test_plane2(data, n, 0, 0, pw - w, ph - h, w, h, pw, ph, fb);
If my mental plotter is working, the overlay and primary can overlap in
the center if (2*w > pw && 2*h > ph). I suppose that's ok as long as the
desired case (top and bottom corner positioning) is tested.
Thanks,
Leo
> +
> + if (w/2 > pw - w || h/2 > ph - h)
> + break;
> +
> + /* Overlap the planes */
> + test_plane2(data, n, 0, 0, w/2, h/2, w, h, pw, ph, fb);
> + }
> +
> + return;
> +
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Compares the result of white backgroud with white window with and without MPO
> *
> @@ -467,6 +571,10 @@ static void test_display_mpo(data_t *data, enum test test, uint32_t format, int
>
> test_init(data);
>
> + /* Skip test if we don't have 2 overlay planes */
> + if (test == MPO_MULTI_OVERLAY)
> + igt_skip_on(!data->overlay2[0]);
> +
> /* Skip if there is less valid outputs than the required. */
> for_each_connected_output(display, output)
> valid_outputs++;
> @@ -494,6 +602,7 @@ static void test_display_mpo(data_t *data, enum test test, uint32_t format, int
> igt_create_fb(data->fd, w, h, DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888, 0, &fb[n].ref_primary);
> igt_create_color_fb(data->fd, w, h, DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888, 0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, &fb[n].ref_primary);
> igt_create_fb(data->fd, w, h, DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888, 0, &fb[n].test_overlay);
> + igt_create_fb(data->fd, w, h, DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888, 0, &fb[n].test_overlay2);
>
> igt_plane_set_fb(data->primary[n], &fb[n].ref_primary);
>
> @@ -520,6 +629,8 @@ static void test_display_mpo(data_t *data, enum test test, uint32_t format, int
>
> if (test == MPO_SINGLE_PAN)
> test_panning_1_display(data, display_count, videos[i][0], videos[i][1], fb);
> + if (test == MPO_MULTI_OVERLAY)
> + test_multi_overlay(data, display_count, videos[i][0], videos[i][1], fb);
> if (test == MPO_MULTI_PAN)
> test_panning_2_display(data, videos[i][0], videos[i][1], fb);
> if(test == MPO_SCALE)
> @@ -536,6 +647,7 @@ static void test_display_mpo(data_t *data, enum test test, uint32_t format, int
> for (int n = 0; n < display_count; n++) {
> igt_remove_fb(data->fd, &fb[n].ref_primary);
> igt_remove_fb(data->fd, &fb[n].test_overlay);
> + igt_remove_fb(data->fd, &fb[n].test_overlay2);
> }
> }
> /*
> @@ -798,6 +910,10 @@ igt_main
> igt_subtest("mpo-pan-multi-p010")
> test_display_mpo(&data, MPO_MULTI_PAN, DRM_FORMAT_P010, DISPLAYS_TO_TEST);
>
> + igt_describe("Multi MPO");
> + igt_subtest("multi-mpo")
> + test_display_mpo(&data, MPO_MULTI_OVERLAY, DRM_FORMAT_NV12, 1);
> +
> igt_describe("MPO and scaling RGB primary plane");
> igt_subtest("mpo-scale-rgb")
> test_display_mpo(&data, MPO_SCALE, DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888, 1);
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list