[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 7/8] tests/sriov_basic: validate driver binding to VFs

[Michal Wajdeczko]

On 09.11.2023 08:06, Laguna, Lukasz wrote:
> 
> On 11/6/2023 23:59, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>>
>> On 06.11.2023 20:59, Lukasz Laguna wrote:
>>> From: Katarzyna Dec <katarzyna.dec at intel.com>
>>>
>>> Test enables VFs in range <1..totalvfs>, bind driver to all of them and
>>> then unbind driver from all of them.
>> commit message seems outdated
> What do you mean? I don't see anything wrong
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Katarzyna Dec <katarzyna.dec at intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna at intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna at intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz at linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   tests/sriov_basic.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/sriov_basic.c b/tests/sriov_basic.c
>>> index fc0914962..179731daf 100644
>>> --- a/tests/sriov_basic.c
>>> +++ b/tests/sriov_basic.c
>>> @@ -61,6 +61,38 @@ static void probe_disable_vfs(int pf_fd, unsigned
>>> int num_vfs)
>>>       igt_assert(!err);
>>>   }
>>>   +/**
>>> + * SUBTEST: enable-vfs-bind-all-unbind-all
>>> + * Description:
>>> + *   Verify VFs enabling, binding the driver and then unbinding it
>>> from all of them
>>> + */
>>> +static void enable_vfs_bind_all_unbind_all(int pf_fd, unsigned int
>>> num_vfs)
>>> +{
>>> +    igt_debug("Using num_vfs=%u\n", num_vfs);
>> nit: "Testing %u VFs" ?
> Done
>>
>>> +
>>> +    igt_require(igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(pf_fd) == 0);
>> duplicates main fixture
> As already answered in different patch - first fixtureis not executed
> between dynamic subtests.
>>
>>> +    igt_warn_on(!igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd));
>>> +    igt_skip_on(igt_sriov_is_driver_autoprobe_enabled(pf_fd));
>> why do we need warn/skip here ?
>> can't we just assert that 'disable' worked ?
> Done
>>
>>> +
>>> +    igt_warn_on(!igt_sriov_enable_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs));
>> can't we just assert ?
> Done
>>
>>> +    igt_assert_eq(num_vfs, igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(pf_fd));
>> why we care here ? if not all are enabled then we fail just later
>> and this is not a test for "enable VFs" that enabled==requested
> Done
>>
>>> +    igt_warn_on(!igt_sriov_enable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd));
>>> +    igt_assert(igt_sriov_is_driver_autoprobe_enabled(pf_fd));
>> can't we just warn ?
>> if that we fail to enable then probe below will fail anyway
> Done
>>
>>> +
>>> +    for (int i = 1; i <= num_vfs; i++) {
>>> +        igt_assert(!igt_sriov_is_vf_drm_driver_probed(pf_fd, i));
>>> +        igt_assert(igt_sriov_bind_vf_drm_driver(pf_fd, i));
>>> +        igt_assert(igt_sriov_is_vf_drm_driver_probed(pf_fd, i));
>> shouldn't we just "expect" to make sure to call "disable VFs" ?
> VFs will be disabled in exit fixture. VFs disabling in subtest is needed
> between dynamic subtests.

but if test passed, then it should do a proper cleanup

maybe problem is that if something went wrong, your igt_assert() aborts
current test which doesn't have a chance to do proper cleanup ?

or maybe that cleanup should be in some mid-test fixture ?

anyway, just seems broken that we need to duplicate the code/logic every
time

>>
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    for (int i = 1; i <= num_vfs; i++) {
>>> +        igt_assert(igt_sriov_unbind_vf_drm_driver(pf_fd, i));
>>> +        igt_assert(!igt_sriov_is_vf_drm_driver_probed(pf_fd, i));
>> do we need to have all VFs loaded ?
>> maybe for BAT test we can just bind/unload one VF at the time ?
> We have such test as well:
> [PATCH i-g-t 8/8] tests/sriov_basic: add more tests for VF driver binding
>     SUBTEST: enable-vfs-bind-unbind-each
>     SUBTEST: bind-unbind-vf

that's good

but the question is still open?
what the benefit of having this test which just open-coded the VF probe
loop that would be otherwise done by the PCI subsystem ?

and again, like autoprobe-on, this doesn't seem good candidate for "BAT"
runs, more like a "STRESS"

>>
>> otherwise it will be almost the same level of stress as in
>> "enable-vfs-autoprobe-on" but with 'manual probe' loop of all VFs
>>
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    igt_assert(igt_sriov_disable_vfs(pf_fd));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   igt_main
>>>   {
>>>       int pf_fd;
>>> @@ -113,6 +145,25 @@ igt_main
>>>           }
>>>       }
>>>   +    igt_describe("Verify VFs enabling, binding the driver and then
>>> unbinding it from all of them");
>>> +    igt_subtest_with_dynamic("enable-vfs-bind-all-unbind-all") {
>>> +        for_each_num_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs) {
>>> +            igt_dynamic_f("numvfs-%u", num_vfs) {
>>> +                enable_vfs_bind_all_unbind_all(pf_fd, num_vfs);
>>> +            }
>>> +        }
>>> +        for_random_num_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs) {
>>> +            igt_dynamic_f("numvfs-random") {
>>> +                enable_vfs_bind_all_unbind_all(pf_fd, num_vfs);
>>> +            }
>>> +        }
>>> +        for_max_num_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs) {
>>> +            igt_dynamic_f("numvfs-all") {
>>> +                enable_vfs_bind_all_unbind_all(pf_fd, num_vfs);
>>> +            }
>>> +        }
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>       igt_fixture {
>>>           igt_sriov_disable_vfs(pf_fd);
>>>           /* abort to avoid execution of next tests with enabled VFs */