[igt-dev] [i-g-t] Revert "syncobj_timeline: don't expect EINVAL for WAIT_UNSUBMITTED, | WAIT_AVAILABLE"

[Simon Ser]

On Monday, November 13th, 2023 at 10:59, Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 13.11.2023 11.55, Simon Ser wrote:
> 
> > NACK. Please fix your docs/testplan/i915_tests.rst instead.
> 
> Let's do fixes outside of master branch where it doesn't bother others.

Sorry, but no. This commit fixes a bug already. The CI regression is
completely unrelated, and Intel-specific, I really don't understand why
it happens in the first place.

Is it by design that actual bug fixes break Intel CI?