[igt-dev] [i-g-t] syncobj_timeline: don't expect EINVAL for WAIT_UNSUBMITTED | WAIT_AVAILABLE
Kamil Konieczny
kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Mon Nov 13 15:34:11 UTC 2023
Hi Bhanu,
thank you for fixing this.
On 2023-11-13 at 15:48:37 +0100, Karolina Stolarek wrote:
> On 13.11.2023 11:43, Bhanuprakash Modem wrote:
> > From: Erik Kurzinger <ekurzinger at nvidia.com>
> >
> > The syncobj_timeline test expects waiting for an unsubmitted fence with
> > the WAIT_AVAILABLE flag set to fail with EINVAL. While this matches the
> > behavior of current kernels, that behavior is incorrect and will be
> > fixed by
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2023-August/418710.html
> >
> > With that fix, the WAIT_AVAILABLE flag will have the intended semantics
> > of waiting for an unsubmitted fence to be submitted instead of failing.
> >
> > Note that this will cause the test to fail with kernels that lack the
> > fix, but such failures will reflect a genuine defect.
> >
> > V2: Fix testplan documentation
---------------------------------- ^
add (Bhanuprakash)
V2: Fix testplan documentation (Bhanuprakash)
> >
Here checkpatch.pl is printing error:
ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'Erik Kurzinger <ekurzinger at nvidia.com>'
As Karolina pointed out, here should go:
Signed-off-by: Erik Kurzinger <ekurzinger at nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact at emersion.fr>
And after that your s-o-b:
> > Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
>
> I think it would be better to submit a separate patch for tesplan changes,
> but I won't block merging the patch as it is.
In this test a testname was decided by value of err, so it really should go
in one patch.
After that changes you may add my Acked-by (after one from Karolina).
Regards,
Kamil
>
> Please add SoB for Erik, Ack from Simon and RB from Zbigniew as it was in
> the original patch.
>
> I tested it locally and all the test cases pass now. Feel free to either add
> Tested-by or Ack from me.
>
> All the best,
> Karolina
>
> > ---
> > tests/syncobj_timeline.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/syncobj_timeline.c b/tests/syncobj_timeline.c
> > index b4e1d093a..ea8341a30 100644
> > --- a/tests/syncobj_timeline.c
> > +++ b/tests/syncobj_timeline.c
> > @@ -135,16 +135,16 @@
> > * Verifies that as we signal points from the host, the syncobj timeline value increments and
> > * that waits for submits/signals works properly.
> > *
> > - * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-all-available-unsubmitted
> > + * SUBTEST: etime-multi-wait-all-available-unsubmitted
> > * Description: Verifies waiting on a list of timeline syncobjs
> > *
> > - * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-all-available-unsubmitted-signaled
> > + * SUBTEST: etime-multi-wait-all-available-unsubmitted-signaled
> > * Description: Verifies waiting on a list of timeline syncobjs
> > *
> > - * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-all-available-unsubmitted-submitted
> > + * SUBTEST: etime-multi-wait-all-available-unsubmitted-submitted
> > * Description: Verifies waiting on a list of timeline syncobjs
> > *
> > - * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-all-available-unsubmitted-submitted-signaled
> > + * SUBTEST: etime-multi-wait-all-available-unsubmitted-submitted-signaled
> > * Description: Verifies waiting on a list of timeline syncobjs
> > *
> > * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-all-unsubmitted
> > @@ -159,16 +159,16 @@
> > * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-all-unsubmitted-submitted-signaled
> > * Description: Verifies waiting on a list of timeline syncobjs
> > *
> > - * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-available-unsubmitted
> > + * SUBTEST: etime-multi-wait-available-unsubmitted
> > * Description: Verifies waiting on a list of timeline syncobjs
> > *
> > - * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-available-unsubmitted-signaled
> > + * SUBTEST: multi-wait-available-unsubmitted-signaled
> > * Description: Verifies waiting on a list of timeline syncobjs
> > *
> > - * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-available-unsubmitted-submitted
> > + * SUBTEST: multi-wait-available-unsubmitted-submitted
> > * Description: Verifies waiting on a list of timeline syncobjs
> > *
> > - * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-available-unsubmitted-submitted-signaled
> > + * SUBTEST: multi-wait-available-unsubmitted-submitted-signaled
> > * Description: Verifies waiting on a list of timeline syncobjs
> > *
> > * SUBTEST: invalid-multi-wait-unsubmitted
> > @@ -213,13 +213,13 @@
> > * SUBTEST: invalid-signal-zero-handles
> > * Description: Verify that signaling an empty list of syncobj handles is rejected
> > *
> > - * SUBTEST: invalid-single-wait-all-available-unsubmitted
> > + * SUBTEST: etime-single-wait-all-available-unsubmitted
> > * Description: Verifies wait behavior on a single timeline syncobj
> > *
> > * SUBTEST: invalid-single-wait-all-unsubmitted
> > * Description: Verifies wait behavior on a single timeline syncobj
> > *
> > - * SUBTEST: invalid-single-wait-available-unsubmitted
> > + * SUBTEST: etime-single-wait-available-unsubmitted
> > * Description: Verifies wait behavior on a single timeline syncobj
> > *
> > * SUBTEST: invalid-single-wait-unsubmitted
> > @@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@ igt_main
> > WAIT_SIGNALED)) != 1)
> > continue;
> > - if ((flags & WAIT_UNSUBMITTED) && !(flags & WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT))
> > + if ((flags & WAIT_UNSUBMITTED) && !((flags & WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT) || (flags & WAIT_AVAILABLE)))
> > err = -EINVAL;
> > else if (!(flags & WAIT_SIGNALED) && !((flags & WAIT_SUBMITTED) && (flags & WAIT_AVAILABLE)))
> > err = -ETIME;
> > @@ -1851,7 +1851,7 @@ igt_main
> > continue;
> > err = 0;
> > - if ((flags & WAIT_UNSUBMITTED) && !(flags & WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT)) {
> > + if ((flags & WAIT_UNSUBMITTED) && !((flags & WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT) || (flags & WAIT_AVAILABLE))) {
> > err = -EINVAL;
> > } else if (flags & WAIT_ALL) {
> > if (flags & (WAIT_UNSUBMITTED | WAIT_SUBMITTED))
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list