[igt-dev] [i-g-t V2] lib/igt_kms: Don't read max dotclock on non-display platforms
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Nov 15 20:46:24 UTC 2023
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 07:32:31PM +0530, Bhanuprakash Modem wrote:
> On non-display platforms, there is no point in checking for
> max dotclock.
>
> V2: Fix resource leak
>
> Fixes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/9672
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_kms.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.c b/lib/igt_kms.c
> index 89510ff22..0aa8f4a46 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_kms.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_kms.c
> @@ -6055,10 +6055,18 @@ int igt_get_max_dotclock(int fd)
> char buf[4096];
> char *s;
> int dir, res, max_dotclock = 0;
> + drmModeRes *resources;
>
> if (!is_intel_device(fd))
> return max_dotclock;
>
> + /* If there is no display, then no point to check for dotclock. */
> + resources = drmModeGetResources(fd);
> + if (!resources)
> + return max_dotclock;
> + else
> + drmModeFreeResources(resources);
Not a big fan of the use of 'else' here. So I'd drop that.
But otherwise looks fine, so
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
However a simpler approach could be to just drop the old
i915_frequency_info fallback and simply return 0 on failure
to read i915_cdclk_info.
> +
> dir = igt_debugfs_dir(fd);
> igt_require(dir);
>
> --
> 2.40.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list