[igt-dev] ✗ CI.xeBAT: failure for Kunit fixes and improvements
Janusz Krzysztofik
janusz.krzysztofik at linux.intel.com
Tue Oct 3 12:07:39 UTC 2023
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 12:39:08 CEST Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: Kunit fixes and improvements
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/124554/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_7508_BAT -> XEIGTPW_9910_BAT
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_9910_BAT absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in XEIGTPW_9910_BAT, please notify your bug team (lgci.bug.filing at intel.com) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Participating hosts (4 -> 4)
> ------------------------------
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_9910_BAT:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt at xe_live_ktest@bo:
> - bat-dg2-oem2: [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2] +2 other tests skip
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7508/bat-dg2-oem2/igt@xe_live_ktest@bo.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_9910/bat-dg2-oem2/igt@xe_live_ktest@bo.html
These IGT side changes require kunit on the kernel side to be built as a
module, while CI Xe specific kconfig makes it built into the kernel. I've
asked CI support what we should do to fix that.
Thanks,
Janusz
>
>
> Known issues
> ------------
>
> Here are the changes found in XEIGTPW_9910_BAT that come from known issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible fixes ####
>
> * igt at kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> - bat-dg2-oem2: [FAIL][3] ([Intel XE#480]) -> [PASS][4] +1 other test pass
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7508/bat-dg2-oem2/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_9910/bat-dg2-oem2/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html
>
> * {igt at xe_create@create-execqueues-noleak}:
> - bat-adlp-7: [FAIL][5] ([Intel XE#524]) -> [PASS][6]
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7508/bat-adlp-7/igt@xe_create@create-execqueues-noleak.html
> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_9910/bat-adlp-7/igt@xe_create@create-execqueues-noleak.html
>
>
> {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
> the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
>
> [Intel XE#480]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/480
> [Intel XE#524]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/524
>
>
> Build changes
> -------------
>
> * IGT: IGT_7508 -> IGTPW_9910
> * Linux: xe-404-22fcf2404f56a8e7aea6734298e0b2b265136313 -> xe-410-02ab43e36623665d8644d46162bd4ec5eeb68489
>
> IGTPW_9910: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_9910/index.html
> IGT_7508: f366406b05ca6b3d16eaa734a91e0833bd159f54 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
> xe-404-22fcf2404f56a8e7aea6734298e0b2b265136313: 22fcf2404f56a8e7aea6734298e0b2b265136313
> xe-410-02ab43e36623665d8644d46162bd4ec5eeb68489: 02ab43e36623665d8644d46162bd4ec5eeb68489
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_9910/index.html
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list