[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 4/5] lib/igt_psr: added function to check active dp pr
Hogander, Jouni
jouni.hogander at intel.com
Wed Oct 25 07:07:51 UTC 2023
On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 06:16 +0000, Joshi, Kunal1 wrote:
> Hello Jouni,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2023 5:46 PM
> To: Joshi, Kunal1 <kunal1.joshi at intel.com>;
> igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy at intel.com>; Manna, Animesh
> <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 4/5] lib/igt_psr: added function to check
> active dp pr
>
> On Fri, 2023-10-20 at 11:35 +0530, Kunal Joshi wrote:
> > Added function to check if pr is active on a output.
> > assuming SRDENT is the state to compare when pr is active
> >
> > Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> > Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kunal Joshi <kunal1.joshi at intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/igt_psr.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/igt_psr.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.c b/lib/igt_psr.c index
> > 4c912a064..683379db6
> > 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_psr.c
> > +++ b/lib/igt_psr.c
> > @@ -390,3 +390,26 @@ bool output_supports_pr(int debugfs_fd,
> > igt_output_t *output)
> >
> > return strstr(buf, "Panel Replay = yes");
> > }
> > +
> > +bool dp_pr_active_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output) {
> > + char debugfs_file[128] = {0};
> > + char buf[PSR_STATUS_MAX_LEN];
> > + const char *state = "SRDENT";
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!strstr(output->name,"DP"))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + sprintf(debugfs_file, "%s/i915_sink_status", output-
> > >name);
> > +
> > + ret = igt_debugfs_simple_read(debugfs_fd, debugfs_file,
> > + buf, sizeof(buf));
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + igt_info("Could not read i915_edp_psr_status:
> > %s\n",
> > + strerror(-ret));
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > + igt_skip_on(strstr(buf, "PSR sink not reliable: yes"));
> > + return strstr(buf, state);
> > +}
>
> > Why did you choose to write new instead of modifying existing c ?
> >
> > BR
> For DP pr we are using different debugfs directory to read,
> so thought of creating new function for clear separation,
>
> But can modify psr_sink_support if you think that will be better way.
I think that would be better approach. Also eases your modifications in
kms_psr.c
BR,
Jouni Högander
>
> Jouni Högander
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.h b/lib/igt_psr.h index
> > 8e36fcf2f..dc603ffc3
> > 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_psr.h
> > +++ b/lib/igt_psr.h
> > @@ -56,5 +56,5 @@ bool i915_psr2_selective_fetch_check(int drm_fd);
> > bool i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1(int drm_fd);
> > void i915_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(int drm_fd);
> > bool output_supports_pr(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output);
> > -
> > +bool dp_pr_active_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output);
> > #endif
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Kunal Joshi
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list