[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 4/5] tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Use gem_has_lmem()
Modem, Bhanuprakash
bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com
Mon Sep 11 14:51:05 UTC 2023
Hi Swati,
On Fri-08-09-2023 11:20 pm, Swati Sharma wrote:
> Instead of using i915_capabilities debugfs to know if platform
> is discrete or not, use gem_has_lmem for the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c | 13 +++----------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c b/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c
> index b5779eaa5..cbb419e12 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c
> @@ -140,15 +140,6 @@ typedef struct {
> static bool dc_state_wait_entry(int drm_fd, int dc_flag, int prev_dc_count);
> static void check_dc_counter(data_t *data, int dc_flag, uint32_t prev_dc_count);
>
> -static bool is_dgfx(data_t *data)
> -{
> - char buf[4096];
> -
> - igt_debugfs_simple_read(data->debugfs_fd, "i915_capabilities",
> - buf, sizeof(buf));
> - return strstr(buf, "is_dgfx: yes");
> -}
> -
> static void setup_output(data_t *data)
> {
> igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
> @@ -661,6 +652,7 @@ static void kms_poll_state_restore(int sig)
> igt_main
> {
> data_t data = {};
> + bool is_dgfx;
>
> igt_fixture {
> data.drm_fd = drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_INTEL);
> @@ -742,7 +734,8 @@ igt_main
>
> igt_describe("This test validates display engine entry to DC9 state");
> igt_subtest("dc9-dpms") {
> - if (!(is_dgfx(&data)))
> + is_dgfx = gem_has_lmem(data.drm_fd);
> + if (!is_dgfx)
> igt_require_f(igt_pm_pc8_plus_residencies_enabled(data.msr_fd),
Patch LGTM, but looks we don't even need of the variable "is_dgfx",
instead you can adjust the igt_require_f().
If it's make sense, please fix the above comment.
Reviewed-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
- Bhanu
> "PC8+ residencies not supported\n");
> test_dc9_dpms(&data);
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list