[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/5] tests/intel/kms_pm_lpsp: Add XE support

[Sharma, Swati2]

On 11-Sep-23 8:14 PM, Modem, Bhanuprakash wrote:
> Hi Swati,
> 
> On Fri-08-09-2023 11:20 pm, Swati Sharma wrote:
>> Add XE driver support for kms pm tests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/intel/kms_pm_lpsp.c | 6 +++---
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_pm_lpsp.c b/tests/intel/kms_pm_lpsp.c
>> index 9b5547cda..7d697b1e2 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/kms_pm_lpsp.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_pm_lpsp.c
>> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
>>    *
>>    * SUBTEST: kms-lpsp
>>    * Description: This test validates lpsp on all connected outputs on 
>> low power PIPE_A
>> - * Driver requirement: i915
>> + * Driver requirement: i915, xe
>>    * Functionality: pm_lpsp
>>    * Mega feature: Display Power
>>    * Run type: FULL
>> @@ -194,8 +194,7 @@ igt_main
>>       data_t data = {};
>>       igt_fixture {
>> -
>> -        data.drm_fd = drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_INTEL);
>> +        data.drm_fd = drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_INTEL | DRIVER_XE);
>>           igt_require(data.drm_fd >= 0);
>>           data.debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(data.drm_fd);
>>           igt_require(data.debugfs_fd >= 0);
>> @@ -208,6 +207,7 @@ igt_main
>>       igt_describe("This test validates lpsp while all crtc are 
>> disabled");
>>       igt_subtest("screens-disabled") {
>> +        igt_require_i915(data.drm_fd);
> 
> Why it is i915 specific?

This test has no ROI if platform supports DC states.
Test requirement not met in function __igt_unique____real_main192, file 
../../../usr/src/igt-gpu-tools/tests/intel/kms_pm_lpsp.c:211:
Test requirement: !dmc_supported(data.debugfs_fd)
DC states supported platform don't have ROI for this subtest
Subtest screens-disabled: SKIP (0.000s)

xe+ we have all platforms supporting dc states, so we can skip this test 
for xe.

> 
> - Bhanu
> 
>>           igt_require_f(!dmc_supported(data.debugfs_fd),
>>                     "DC states supported platform don't have ROI for 
>> this subtest\n");
>>           screens_disabled_subtest(&data);