[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 4/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: scale duration option fixes
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Sep 20 16:06:56 UTC 2023
Hi,
On 06/09/2023 16:51, Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
> Fixed range duration check when scale duration (-f) command line option
> is provided + PERIOD step takes scale duration into account.
> Moved duration parsing code from parse_workload to separate function.
> Moved wsim_err, __duration definitions before parse_duration.
> Moved unbound_duration from struct w_step to struct duration.
Kudos for managing to navigate through this tool! :)
One request I would have before looking in more detail is to split
refactoring from functional changes. In this case, from the commit
message at least, it seems to me these could be four patches:
1. Move wsim_err
2. Reposition the unbound duration boolean.
3. Extract the duration parsing code to a new function.
4. Fix scaling of period steps.
Maybe actually.. have you noticed there are two command line options:
" -f <scale> Scale factor for batch durations.\n"
" -F <scale> Scale factor for delays.\n"
-f is only supposed to affect batches, while -F works on delays. Nothing
seems to work on periods so indeed that maybe needs changing and have -F
cover them too.
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> benchmarks/gem_wsim.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> index 7b5e62a3b..f4024deb1 100644
> --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ enum intel_engine_id {
>
> struct duration {
> unsigned int min, max;
> + bool unbound_duration;
> };
>
> enum w_type
> @@ -145,7 +146,6 @@ struct w_step
> unsigned int context;
> unsigned int engine;
> struct duration duration;
> - bool unbound_duration;
> struct deps data_deps;
> struct deps fence_deps;
> int emit_fence;
> @@ -240,6 +240,19 @@ static struct drm_i915_gem_context_param_sseu device_sseu = {
> #define DEPSYNC (1<<2)
> #define SSEU (1<<3)
>
> +static void __attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
> +wsim_err(const char *fmt, ...)
> +{
> + va_list ap;
> +
> + if (!verbose)
> + return;
> +
> + va_start(ap, fmt);
> + vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
> + va_end(ap);
> +}
> +
> static const char *ring_str_map[NUM_ENGINES] = {
> [DEFAULT] = "DEFAULT",
> [RCS] = "RCS",
> @@ -429,17 +442,43 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void __attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
> -wsim_err(const char *fmt, ...)
> +static long __duration(long dur, double scale)
> {
> - va_list ap;
> + return round(scale * dur);
> +}
>
> - if (!verbose)
> - return;
> +static int
> +parse_duration(unsigned int nr_steps, struct duration *dur, double scale_dur, char *_desc)
> +{
> + char *sep = NULL;
> + long tmpl;
>
> - va_start(ap, fmt);
> - vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
> - va_end(ap);
> + if (_desc[0] == '*') {
> + if (intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)) < 8) {
> + wsim_err("Infinite batch at step %u needs Gen8+!\n", nr_steps);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + dur->unbound_duration = true;
> + } else {
> + tmpl = strtol(_desc, &sep, 10);
> + if (tmpl <= 0 || tmpl == LONG_MIN || tmpl == LONG_MAX)
> + return -1;
> +
> + dur->min = __duration(tmpl, scale_dur);
> +
> + if (sep && *sep == '-') {
> + tmpl = strtol(sep + 1, NULL, 10);
> + if (tmpl <= 0 || __duration(tmpl, scale_dur) <= dur->min ||
> + tmpl == LONG_MIN || tmpl == LONG_MAX)
> + return -1;
> +
> + dur->max = __duration(tmpl, scale_dur);
> + } else {
> + dur->max = dur->min;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> #define check_arg(cond, fmt, ...) \
> @@ -855,11 +894,6 @@ static uint64_t engine_list_mask(const char *_str)
> static unsigned long
> allocate_working_set(struct workload *wrk, struct working_set *set);
>
> -static long __duration(long dur, double scale)
> -{
> - return round(scale * dur);
> -}
> -
> #define int_field(_STEP_, _FIELD_, _COND_, _ERR_) \
> if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) { \
> tmp = atoi(field); \
> @@ -899,8 +933,14 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> int_field(DELAY, delay, tmp <= 0,
> "Invalid delay at step %u!\n");
> } else if (!strcmp(field, "p")) {
> - int_field(PERIOD, period, tmp <= 0,
> - "Invalid period at step %u!\n");
> + field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
> + if (field) {
> + tmp = atoi(field);
> + check_arg(tmp <= 0, "Invalid period at step %u!\n", nr_steps);
> + step.type = PERIOD;
> + step.period = __duration(tmp, scale_dur);
> + goto add_step;
> + }
> } else if (!strcmp(field, "P")) {
> unsigned int nr = 0;
> while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> @@ -1121,38 +1161,11 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> }
>
> if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> - char *sep = NULL;
> - long int tmpl;
> -
> fstart = NULL;
>
> - if (field[0] == '*') {
> - check_arg(intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)) < 8,
> - "Infinite batch at step %u needs Gen8+!\n",
> - nr_steps);
> - step.unbound_duration = true;
> - } else {
> - tmpl = strtol(field, &sep, 10);
> - check_arg(tmpl <= 0 || tmpl == LONG_MIN ||
> - tmpl == LONG_MAX,
> - "Invalid duration at step %u!\n",
> - nr_steps);
> - step.duration.min = __duration(tmpl, scale_dur);
> -
> - if (sep && *sep == '-') {
> - tmpl = strtol(sep + 1, NULL, 10);
> - check_arg(tmpl <= 0 ||
> - tmpl <= step.duration.min ||
> - tmpl == LONG_MIN ||
> - tmpl == LONG_MAX,
> - "Invalid duration range at step %u!\n",
> - nr_steps);
> - step.duration.max = __duration(tmpl,
> - scale_dur);
> - } else {
> - step.duration.max = step.duration.min;
> - }
> - }
> + tmp = parse_duration(nr_steps, &step.duration, scale_dur, field);
> + check_arg(tmp < 0,
> + "Invalid duration at step %u!\n", nr_steps);
>
> valid++;
> }
> @@ -2172,7 +2185,7 @@ update_bb_start(struct workload *wrk, struct w_step *w)
>
> /* ticks is inverted for MI_DO_COMPARE (less-than comparison) */
> ticks = 0;
> - if (!w->unbound_duration)
> + if (!w->duration.unbound_duration)
> ticks = ~ns_to_ctx_ticks(1000 * get_duration(wrk, w));
>
> *w->bb_duration = ticks;
> @@ -2349,7 +2362,7 @@ static void *run_workload(void *data)
>
> igt_assert(t_idx >= 0 && t_idx < i);
> igt_assert(wrk->steps[t_idx].type == BATCH);
> - igt_assert(wrk->steps[t_idx].unbound_duration);
> + igt_assert(wrk->steps[t_idx].duration.unbound_duration);
>
> *wrk->steps[t_idx].bb_duration = 0xffffffff;
> __sync_synchronize();
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list