[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 07/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: cleanups

Bernatowicz, Marcin marcin.bernatowicz at linux.intel.com
Thu Sep 28 08:37:29 UTC 2023



On 9/27/2023 9:03 PM, Bernatowicz, Marcin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/26/2023 1:08 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 26/09/2023 09:44, Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
>>> Cleaning checkpatch.pl reported warnings/errors.
>>> Removed unused fence_signal field from struct w_step.
>>> calloc vs malloc in parse_workload for struct workload.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz at linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   benchmarks/gem_wsim.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>   1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>>> index 3b01340bf..daa20fb8a 100644
>>> --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>>> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>>> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>>>   /*
>>>    * Copyright © 2017 Intel Corporation
>>>    *
>>> @@ -76,8 +77,7 @@ struct duration {
>>>       bool unbound_duration;
>>>   };
>>> -enum w_type
>>> -{
>>> +enum w_type {
>>>       BATCH,
>>>       SYNC,
>>>       DELAY,
>>> @@ -102,8 +102,7 @@ struct dep_entry {
>>>       int working_set; /* -1 = step dependecy, >= 0 working set id */
>>>   };
>>> -struct deps
>>> -{
>>> +struct deps {
>>>       int nr;
>>>       bool submit_fence;
>>>       struct dep_entry *list;
>>> @@ -137,8 +136,7 @@ struct working_set {
>>>   struct workload;
>>> -struct w_step
>>> -{
>>> +struct w_step {
>>>       struct workload *wrk;
>>>       /* Workload step metadata */
>>> @@ -155,7 +153,6 @@ struct w_step
>>>           int period;
>>>           int target;
>>>           int throttle;
>>> -        int fence_signal;
>>>           int priority;
>>>           struct {
>>>               unsigned int engine_map_count;
>>> @@ -194,8 +191,7 @@ struct ctx {
>>>       uint64_t sseu;
>>>   };
>>> -struct workload
>>> -{
>>> +struct workload {
>>>       unsigned int id;
>>>       unsigned int nr_steps;
>>> @@ -807,6 +803,7 @@ static int add_buffers(struct working_set *set, 
>>> char *str)
>>>       for (i = 0; i < add; i++) {
>>>           struct work_buffer_size *sz = &sizes[set->nr + i];
>>> +
>>>           sz->min = min_sz;
>>>           sz->max = max_sz;
>>>           sz->size = 0;
>>> @@ -895,13 +892,16 @@ parse_duration(unsigned int nr_steps, struct 
>>> duration *dur, double scale_dur, ch
>>>   }
>>>   #define int_field(_STEP_, _FIELD_, _COND_, _ERR_) \
>>> -    if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) { \
>>> -        tmp = atoi(field); \
>>> -        check_arg(_COND_, _ERR_, nr_steps); \
>>> -        step.type = _STEP_; \
>>> -        step._FIELD_ = tmp; \
>>> -        goto add_step; \
>>> -    } \
>>> +    do { \
>>> +        field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx); \
>>> +        if (field) { \
>>> +            tmp = atoi(field); \
>>> +            check_arg(_COND_, _ERR_, nr_steps); \
>>> +            step.type = _STEP_; \
>>> +            step._FIELD_ = tmp; \
>>> +            goto add_step; \
>>> +        } \
>>> +    } while (0)
>>>   static struct workload *
>>>   parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double 
>>> scale_dur,
>>> @@ -926,7 +926,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>           valid = 0;
>>>           memset(&step, 0, sizeof(step));
>>> -        if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>> +        field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
>>> +        if (field) {
>>>               fstart = NULL;
>>>               if (!strcmp(field, "d")) {
>>> @@ -943,6 +944,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>                   }
>>>               } else if (!strcmp(field, "P")) {
>>>                   unsigned int nr = 0;
>>> +
>>>                   while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>>                       tmp = atoi(field);
>>>                       check_arg(nr == 0 && tmp <= 0,
>>> @@ -968,6 +970,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>                         "Invalid sync target at step %u!\n");
>>>               } else if (!strcmp(field, "S")) {
>>>                   unsigned int nr = 0;
>>> +
>>>                   while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>>                       tmp = atoi(field);
>>>                       check_arg(tmp <= 0 && nr == 0,
>>> @@ -1004,6 +1007,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>                   goto add_step;
>>>               } else if (!strcmp(field, "M")) {
>>>                   unsigned int nr = 0;
>>> +
>>>                   while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>>                       tmp = atoi(field);
>>>                       check_arg(nr == 0 && tmp <= 0,
>>> @@ -1034,6 +1038,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>                         "Invalid terminate target at step %u!\n");
>>>               } else if (!strcmp(field, "X")) {
>>>                   unsigned int nr = 0;
>>> +
>>>                   while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>>                       tmp = atoi(field);
>>>                       check_arg(nr == 0 && tmp <= 0,
>>> @@ -1058,6 +1063,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>                   goto add_step;
>>>               } else if (!strcmp(field, "B")) {
>>>                   unsigned int nr = 0;
>>> +
>>>                   while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>>                       tmp = atoi(field);
>>>                       check_arg(nr == 0 && tmp <= 0,
>>> @@ -1077,6 +1083,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>                   goto add_step;
>>>               } else if (!strcmp(field, "b")) {
>>>                   unsigned int nr = 0;
>>> +
>>>                   while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>>                       check_arg(nr > 2,
>>>                             "Invalid bond format at step %u!\n",
>>> @@ -1148,7 +1155,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>               valid++;
>>>           }
>>> -        if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>> +        field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
>>> +        if (field) {
>>>               fstart = NULL;
>>>               i = str_to_engine(field);
>>> @@ -1160,7 +1168,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>               step.engine = i;
>>>           }
>>> -        if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>> +        field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
>>> +        if (field) {
>>>               fstart = NULL;
>>>               tmp = parse_duration(nr_steps, &step.duration, 
>>> scale_dur, field);
>>> @@ -1170,7 +1179,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>               valid++;
>>>           }
>>> -        if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>> +        field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
>>> +        if (field) {
>>>               fstart = NULL;
>>>               tmp = parse_dependencies(nr_steps, &step, field);
>>> @@ -1180,7 +1190,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>               valid++;
>>>           }
>>> -        if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
>>> +        field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
>>> +        if (field) {
>>>               fstart = NULL;
>>>               check_arg(strlen(field) != 1 ||
>>> @@ -1224,7 +1235,7 @@ add_step:
>>>           nr_steps += app_w->nr_steps;
>>>       }
>>> -    wrk = malloc(sizeof(*wrk));
>>> +    wrk = calloc(1, sizeof(*wrk));
>>
>> Rest looks fine but this change I don't know what checkpatch has 
>> against it and why calloc(1,..) is better. That's the kernels 
>> checkpatch.pl? I don't get it when I run it.
> 
> I'll restore it in next version.
> My previous patch changes contained fields which were zeroed here, now 
> it's not required and creates confusion, I agree it's not a 
> cleanup/issue and not reported by the any tool.
> -- 
> marcin

I rememeber why I added it, to zero the nr_ctxs value and be able to do 
cleanup in fini_workload. It's not a problem of present code, as we do 
not touch (ex. destroy) contexts in fini_workload, but with coming
changes we will need this nr_ctxs zero initialization (either explicit 
or with calloc), because of:

	for (i = 0; i < clients; i++)
		fini_workload(w[i]); <- those are clones, nr_ctxs is correct as clones 
are calloc'ed and we called prepare_workload on them
	free(w);
	for (i = 0; i < nr_w_args; i++)
		fini_workload(wrk[i]);  <- this ones may have garbage in nr_ctxs 
causing issues

But that is for other patch with changes.

>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tvrtko
>>
>>>       igt_assert(wrk);
>>>       wrk->nr_steps = nr_steps;
>>> @@ -2717,6 +2728,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>       if (append_workload_arg) {
>>>           struct w_arg arg = { NULL, append_workload_arg, 0 };
>>> +
>>>           app_w = parse_workload(&arg, flags, scale_dur, scale_time,
>>>                          NULL);
>>>           if (!app_w) {


More information about the igt-dev mailing list