[PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/intel/gem_exec_capture: Fix many-* subtests
Kamil Konieczny
kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Fri Apr 19 15:05:53 UTC 2024
Hi Peter,
On 2024-04-11 at 21:53:34 +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> Currently trying to run `gem_exec_capture --run-subtest
> many-4K-incremental` or `gem_exec_capture --run-subtest many-4K-zero`
> will fail with:
>
> (gem_exec_capture:81999) i915/gem_engine_topology-CRITICAL: Test
> assertion failure function gem_engine_properties_configure, file
> ../lib/i915/gem_engine_topology.c:577:
> (gem_exec_capture:81999) i915/gem_engine_topology-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: ret == 1
> (gem_exec_capture:81999) i915/gem_engine_topology-CRITICAL: Last errno: 9, Bad file descriptor
> (gem_exec_capture:81999) i915/gem_engine_topology-CRITICAL: error: -1 != 1
>
> This problem happens inside the macro find_first_available_engine()
> when:
> 1. for_each_ctx_engine() allocates an struct intel_engine_data 'ed'
> inside a for loop. The core of the issue is that ed only exists
> inside the for loop. As soon as the for loop ends, ed is out of scope
> and after it's lifetime.
> 2. intel_get_current_engine() sets '*e' to an address of ed. This is ok
> while inside the for loop, and is undefined behavior after the for
> loop ends.
> 3. configure_hangs() uses '*e' after the lifetime of 'ed' has ended
> leading to undefined behavior
> 4. After the call to find_first_available_engine() __captureN() will
> fail as it expects '*e' to be valid. This is also undefined
> behavior.
>
> Additionally, this patch sets 'e' to NULL early on at the macro, and at
> the end check if it is still NULL. If so it will skip the test to
> prevent downstream code from crashing.
Strictly speaking we are not preventing crash but catch a case
when test cannot proceed (as it needs capable engine),
so then we skip it. Btw I plan on re-testing it on Monday and
merge it next week with that small description correction.
Regards,
Kamil
>
> v2: removed the 'igt_assert(tmpe)'; added the explanation about
> checking if e is still NULL by the end of the macro to decide to skip
> the test or not.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <me at petersenna.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/gem_exec_capture.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/gem_exec_capture.c b/tests/intel/gem_exec_capture.c
> index 57b178f3e..e6598ec42 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/gem_exec_capture.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/gem_exec_capture.c
> @@ -662,13 +662,18 @@ static bool needs_recoverable_ctx(int fd)
>
> #define find_first_available_engine(fd, ctx, e, saved) \
> do { \
> + struct intel_execution_engine2 *tmpe = NULL; \
> + e = NULL; \
> + \
> ctx = intel_ctx_create_all_physical(fd); \
> igt_assert(ctx); \
> - for_each_ctx_engine(fd, ctx, e) \
> - for_each_if(gem_class_can_store_dword(fd, e->class)) \
> + for_each_ctx_engine(fd, ctx, tmpe) \
> + if(gem_class_can_store_dword(fd, tmpe->class)) { \
> + saved = configure_hangs(fd, tmpe, ctx->id); \
> + e = &saved.engine; \
> break; \
> - igt_assert(e); \
> - saved = configure_hangs(fd, e, ctx->id); \
> + } \
> + igt_skip_on_f(e == NULL, "no capable engine found\n"); \
> } while(0)
>
> static void many(int fd, int dir, uint64_t size, unsigned int flags)
> --
> 2.44.0
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list