[PATCH i-g-t v3] tests/core_setmaster: Adjust loop control in tweak_perm
Bommu, Krishnaiah
krishnaiah.bommu at intel.com
Mon Aug 5 05:29:32 UTC 2024
On 31-07-2024 23:26, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 at 09:31, Bommu Krishnaiah
> <krishnaiah.bommu at intel.com> wrote:
>> The `tweak_perm` function now uses `continue` instead of `break` when
>> encountering non-existent card paths. This change addresses the assumption
>> in existing userspace that card paths are contiguous, which may not be true
>> if cards are dynamically removed.
>>
>> Problem Description:
>> The test fails after running the `core_hotunplug at hot*` subtest, where card0 is missing.
>> This leads to a failure in the subsequent `master-drop-set-user` test.
>>
>> Command sequence for reproducing the issue:
>> - Check available cards: `ls /dev/dri/`
>> - Output: by-path card0 renderD128
>> - Run the test: `# ./core_hotunplug --r hotrebind-lateclose`
>> - Check again: ‘ls /dev/dri/’
>> - Output after failure: by-path card1 renderD129
>> - Run the test: `# ./core_setmaster --r master-drop-set-user`
>>
>> This failures on both XE and i915 for above sequence.
>>
> The commit message is still a bit strange, but I'll refer that to your
> colleague who already gave you good tips.
tests/core_setmaster: Handle the test even if cards are non-continuous
Although most of userspace assumes drm cards to be populated continously,
this assumption may not be always true. After hot unpluging and
repluging of card
the card may be non-continous. To address such scenarios where the
cards can be non-continous
modify the tweak_perm function to loop all possible
cardnumbers(card0-card255) to confirm are they populated or not.
Problem Description:
The test fails after running the `core_hotunplug at hot*` subtest, where
card0 is missing.
This leads to a failure in the subsequent `master-drop-set-user` test.
Command sequence for reproducing the issue:
- Check available cards: `ls /dev/dri/`
- Output: by-path card0 renderD128
- Run the test: `# ./core_hotunplug --r hotrebind-lateclose`
- Check again: ‘ls /dev/dri/’
- Output after failure: by-path card1 renderD129
- Run the test: `# ./core_setmaster --r master-drop-set-user`
This failures on both XE and i915 for above sequence.
> Fwiw the "existing usespace" refers to mesa, Xorg (both server and
> drivers) as well as gstreamer, if I recall correctly. There may be
> others assume there's no gaps.
here I am referring to IGT, may be as you said few may be continues, but
this change works for continues also.
>> Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah<krishnaiah.bommu at intel.com>
>> Cc: Emil Velikov<emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray<himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/core_setmaster.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/core_setmaster.c b/tests/core_setmaster.c
>> index 9c2083f66..a2758e2f2 100644
>> --- a/tests/core_setmaster.c
>> +++ b/tests/core_setmaster.c
>> @@ -116,9 +116,10 @@ static unsigned tweak_perm(uint8_t *saved_perm, unsigned max_perm, bool save)
>> for (i = 0; i < max_perm; i++) {
>> snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/dev/dri/card%u", i);
>>
>> - /* Existing userspace assumes there's no gaps, do the same. */
>> + /* Userspace cannot always have continuous card0...N due to
>> + * dynamic unloading or removal of cards */
> Is this "dynamic unloading or removal of cards" a relatively new
> thing? Back when I wrote there test, unloading DRM modules wasn't
> supported (I believe) hence, it wasn't possible to have gaps.
I don't think dynamic unloading or removal of cards is new
core_hotunplug test verifies unloading of i915/xe driver module
>
> Or does this feature/work that only affects IGT and normal day-to-day
> userspace will never hit this case?
as I mentioned in commit message running sequence is not done before
Regards,
Krishna
>
> Should probably mention a word or two about this in the commit
> message/inline comment.
>
> HTH,
> Emil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev/attachments/20240805/c1c121d3/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list