Re: ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure for lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests (rev6)
Peter Senna Tschudin
peter.senna at linux.intel.com
Thu Aug 8 06:54:54 UTC 2024
On 02.08.2024 12:32, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests (rev6)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/136499/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_7952_full -> XEIGTPW_11522_full
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_11522_full absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in XEIGTPW_11522_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Participating hosts (4 -> 4)
> ------------------------------
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_11522_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt at kms_async_flips@async-flip-with-page-flip-events at pipe-a-edp-1-linear:
> - shard-lnl: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] +3 other tests fail
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7952/shard-lnl-3/igt@kms_async_flips@async-flip-with-page-flip-events@pipe-a-edp-1-linear.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11522/shard-lnl-4/igt@kms_async_flips@async-flip-with-page-flip-events@pipe-a-edp-1-linear.html
>
> * igt at kms_plane_cursor@primary:
> - shard-lnl: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] +1 other test dmesg-warn
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7952/shard-lnl-3/igt@kms_plane_cursor@primary.html
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11522/shard-lnl-5/igt@kms_plane_cursor@primary.html
Dear I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org,
The above does not seem to be related to my series.
Thank you!
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list