[PATCH] tests/intel/xe_vm_create: Check negative cases for vm_create ioctl

[Piecielska, Katarzyna]

Negative test to check vm_create ioctl returns expected error when invalid flags, extensions, reserved  param is used.

Signed-off-by: Pravalika Gurram <pravalika.gurram at intel.com>
---
 tests/intel/xe_vm_create.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/meson.build          |   1 +
 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/intel/xe_vm_create.c

(Kasia) We have binary tests/intel/xe_vm.c - in my opinion this new test should go there instead of creating new binary.

diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_vm_create.c b/tests/intel/xe_vm_create.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2430e6739
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_vm_create.c
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+/*
+ * Copyright © 2024 Intel Corporation
+ */
+
+#include "igt.h"
+#include "xe_drm.h"
+
+/**
+ * TEST: Negative test for vm create ioctl
+ * Category: Core
+ * Mega feature: General Core features
+ * Sub-category: Synchronization
+ * Functionality: vm create
+ * Test category: negative test
+ */
+
+/**
+ * SUBTEST: invalid-flag-%s
+ * Description:  function %arg[1] used in vm create IOCTL to make it 
+fail
+ * Functionality: fault
+ *
+ * arg[1]:
+ * @xe_vm_create_fault:  xe_vm_create_fault
+ * @xe_vm_create_scrach_fault: xe_vm_create_scrach_fault
+ * @xe_vm_create_scrach_fault_lr:    xe_vm_create_scrach_fault_lr
+ */
+
+static void invalid_flag(int fd, __u32 flags) {
+	struct drm_xe_vm_create create = {
+		.flags = flags,
+	};
+
+	do_ioctl_err(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_VM_CREATE, &create, EINVAL);
+
+}
+
+/**
+ * SUBTEST: invalid-extensions
+ * Description: Check query with invalid extensions returns expected 
+error code
+ *
+ * SUBTEST: invalid-reserved
+ * Description: Check query with invalid reserved value returns 
+expected error code  */
+
+static void inavlid_extensions(int fd)
I believe we have typo here ^ s/inavlid/invalid/
+{
+	struct drm_xe_vm_create create = {
+		.extensions = -1,
+	};
+
+	do_ioctl_err(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_VM_CREATE, &create, EINVAL);
+
+}
+
+static void inavlid_reserved(int fd)
I believe we have typo here ^ s/inavlid/invalid/
+{
+	struct drm_xe_vm_create create = {
+		.reserved[0] = 0xffff,
+	};
+
+	do_ioctl_err(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_VM_CREATE, &create, EINVAL);
+
+}
+
+igt_main
+{
+	int fd;
+
+	const struct section {
+		const char *name;
+		__u32 flags;
+	} vm_create_flags_fail_functions[] = {
+		{ "xe_vm_create_fault", DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE },
+		{ "xe_vm_create_scrach_fault",
+			DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE |
+			DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE },
+		{ "xe_vm_create_scrach_fault_lr",
+			~(DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE |
+			DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE |
+			DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE) },
+		{ }
+	};
+
+	igt_fixture
+		fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
+
+	for (const struct section *s = vm_create_flags_fail_functions; s->name; s++) {
+		igt_subtest_f("invalid-flag-%s", s->name)
+			invalid_flag(fd, s->flags);
+	}
+
+	igt_subtest("invalid-extensions")
+			inavlid_extensions(fd);
I believe we have typo here ^ s/inavlid/invalid/
+
+	igt_subtest("invalid-reserved")
+			inavlid_reserved(fd);
I believe we have typo here ^ s/inavlid/invalid/
+
+	igt_fixture {
+		drm_close_driver(fd);
+	}
+
+}
diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build index 2724c7a9a..fb9fc75d8 100644
--- a/tests/meson.build
+++ b/tests/meson.build
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ intel_xe_progs = [
 	'xe_sysfs_scheduler',
         'xe_sysfs_timeslice_duration',
         'xe_tlb',
+        'xe_vm_create',
 ]
 
 intel_xe_eudebug_progs = [
--
2.34.1